Buy your textbooks here

Free SC0-402 Text Books of Killexams.com | Practice test | Braindumps | Study Guides | Mock Tests

Worried about SC0-402 Test? We are here to help! Just download our SC0-402 Practice Test - Read and Take Test You will get good marks - Practice test - Study Guides | Mock Tests

Pass4sure SC0-402 dumps | Killexams.com SC0-402 true questions | https://www.textbookw.com/


Killexams.com SC0-402 Dumps and true Questions

100% true Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with tall Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



SC0-402 exam Dumps Source : Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC)

Test Code : SC0-402
Test designation : Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC)
Vendor designation : SCP
: 410 true Questions

nice to pay interest that contemporary-day dumps modern-day SC0-402 exam are to exist had.
Hi all, gratify exist knowledgeable that I actually believe handed the SC0-402 examination with killexams.com, which was my essential training source, with a tenacious common rating. This is a totally convincing examination fabric, which I exceptionally counsel to All people running closer to their IT certification. This is a dependable manner to establish together and bypass your IT tests. In my IT employer, there isnt a person who has not used/visible/heard/ of the killexams.com substances. Not most effectual achieve they assist you bypass, however they ensure which you learn and remain up a a hit professional.


pleasant to hear that actual exam questions present day SC0-402 examination are to exist had.
This is my first time that I took this service. I feel very confident in SC0-402 but. I prepare my SC0-402 using questions and answers with exam simulator softare by killexams.com team.


Updated and actual question bank of SC0-402.
I went loopy while my test changed into in every week and that i out of station my SC0-402 syllabus. I were given blank and wasnt able to discern out the passage to cope up with the scenario. Manifestly, they All are privy to the import the syllabus at some point of the practise period. Its miles the excellent paper which directs the manner. At the same time as i used to exist almost mad, I were given to recognize about killexams. Cant thank my buddy for making me privy to the sort of blessing. Practise changed into a gross lot less difficult with the allay of SC0-402 syllabus which I got via the web site.


Did you attempted this outstanding supply cutting-edge SC0-402 dumps.
I wanted to believe certification in test SC0-402 and i accept it with killexams. consummate pattern of original modules facilitate me to attempt All the 38 questions inside the given time-body. I score more than 87. I actually believe to mention that I may want to in no passage ever believe carried out it on my own what i used which will accumulate with killexams.Com . Killexams.Com present the ultra-present day module of questions and cover the associated subjects. Thanks to killexams.Com .


am i able to locate phone number of SC0-402 licensed?
This is absolutely the achievement of killexams.com, now not mine. Very person pleasant SC0-402 exam simulator and authentic SC0-402 QAs.


No waste cutting-edge time on internet! observed genuine source today's SC0-402 questions.
At ultimate, my score ninety% changed into more than desire. at the point when the examination SC0-402 become handiest 1 week away, my making plans become in an indiscriminate situation. I predicted that i would want to retake inside the occasion of disappointment to accept 80% pass imprints. Taking after a partners recommendation, i purchased the from killexams.com and could recall a moderate arrangement by passage of commonly composed substance.


Very smooth to accept licensed in SC0-402 examination with this believe a inspect at manual.
sure, the question bank could exist very useful and that i hint it to anyone who desires to recall those assessments. Congrats on a process properly concept out and done. I cleared my SC0-402 tests.


simply attempted SC0-402 question bank as soon as and i'm convinced.
With the disburse of exceptional products of killexams.com, I had scored ninety two percentage marks in SC0-402 certification. i waslooking for liable observe fabric to boom my information stage. Technical standards and difficult language of my certification changed into hard to recognize therefore i used to exist searching for liable and clean recall a inspect atproducts. I had gain to realize this internet site for the instruction of expert certification. It was not an clean task butonly killexams.com has made this task effortless for me. im passion excellent for my achievement and this platform is satisfactory for me.


first rate source latest high-highexcellent SC0-402 irony dumps, rectify answers.
im now not an aficionado of on line killexams.com, in light of the fact that they are often posted by passage of flighty individuals who misdirect I into mastering stuff I neednt worry with and missing things that I absolutely want to recognise. not killexams.com . This commerce enterprise offers absolutely superb sized killexams.com that assist me overcome SC0-402 exam readiness. that is the passage by which I passed this exam from the second one strive and scored 87% marks. thanks


That changed into incredible! I got today's dumps present day SC0-402 examination.
There is not a superb deal SC0-402 exam substances out there, so I went in promote and purchased those SC0-402 questions and solutions. in reality, it received my coronary heart with the manner the statistics is prepared. And yeah, thats right: mostquestions I noticed on the exam believe been exactly what turned into furnished by killexams.com. Im relieved to believe exceeded SC0-402 exam.


SCP SCP Network Defense and

SCA Property group raises $262.4 million | killexams.com true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

SCA Property neighborhood (ASX:SCP), a huge landlord of the Woolworths neighborhood, has effectively achieved the thoroughly underwritten institutional placement announced the day gone by elevating $262.4 million during the situation of about 113.1 million original completely paid gauge devices.

The proceeds can exist partly fund the acquisition of 10 shopping centres from vicinity for $573 million.

Eligible unitholders who were registered as SCP unitholders as at 7.00pm on Tuesday 2 October 2018 should exist invited to subscribe for up to $15,000 of additional original units, freed from brokerage and transaction expenses.

Shares in SCA Property neighborhood (ASX:SCP) are down 1.05 per cent to $2.35 


SCP Vitalife Expands Israel-To-US approach | killexams.com true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

SCP Vitalife is ramping up what has confirmed to exist a profitable strategy of connecting the U.S. and Israeli clinical industries. Its former members consist of Israeli Deputy major Minister and Minister of defense Ehud Barak, who changed into a accomplice of SCP partners from 2001 to 2007.


Ametek SCP | killexams.com true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

No outcomes discovered, try original key phrase!Matt Christiansen has joined Westerly, R.I.-primarily based Ametek SCP as senior design engineer. He changed into engineering supervisor at Seacon superior items. You requisite to believe an Aviation Week Intelligence community (AWI...


Killexams.com SC0-402 Dumps and true Questions

100% true Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with tall Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



SC0-402 exam Dumps Source : Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC)

Test Code : SC0-402
Test designation : Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC)
Vendor designation : SCP
: 410 true Questions

nice to pay interest that contemporary-day dumps modern-day SC0-402 exam are to exist had.
Hi all, gratify exist knowledgeable that I actually believe handed the SC0-402 examination with killexams.com, which was my essential training source, with a tenacious common rating. This is a totally convincing examination fabric, which I exceptionally counsel to All people running closer to their IT certification. This is a dependable manner to establish together and bypass your IT tests. In my IT employer, there isnt a person who has not used/visible/heard/ of the killexams.com substances. Not most effectual achieve they assist you bypass, however they ensure which you learn and remain up a a hit professional.


pleasant to hear that actual exam questions present day SC0-402 examination are to exist had.
This is my first time that I took this service. I feel very confident in SC0-402 but. I prepare my SC0-402 using questions and answers with exam simulator softare by killexams.com team.


Updated and actual question bank of SC0-402.
I went loopy while my test changed into in every week and that i out of station my SC0-402 syllabus. I were given blank and wasnt able to discern out the passage to cope up with the scenario. Manifestly, they All are privy to the import the syllabus at some point of the practise period. Its miles the excellent paper which directs the manner. At the same time as i used to exist almost mad, I were given to recognize about killexams. Cant thank my buddy for making me privy to the sort of blessing. Practise changed into a gross lot less difficult with the allay of SC0-402 syllabus which I got via the web site.


Did you attempted this outstanding supply cutting-edge SC0-402 dumps.
I wanted to believe certification in test SC0-402 and i accept it with killexams. consummate pattern of original modules facilitate me to attempt All the 38 questions inside the given time-body. I score more than 87. I actually believe to mention that I may want to in no passage ever believe carried out it on my own what i used which will accumulate with killexams.Com . Killexams.Com present the ultra-present day module of questions and cover the associated subjects. Thanks to killexams.Com .


am i able to locate phone number of SC0-402 licensed?
This is absolutely the achievement of killexams.com, now not mine. Very person pleasant SC0-402 exam simulator and authentic SC0-402 QAs.


No waste cutting-edge time on internet! observed genuine source today's SC0-402 questions.
At ultimate, my score ninety% changed into more than desire. at the point when the examination SC0-402 become handiest 1 week away, my making plans become in an indiscriminate situation. I predicted that i would want to retake inside the occasion of disappointment to accept 80% pass imprints. Taking after a partners recommendation, i purchased the from killexams.com and could recall a moderate arrangement by passage of commonly composed substance.


Very smooth to accept licensed in SC0-402 examination with this believe a inspect at manual.
sure, the question bank could exist very useful and that i hint it to anyone who desires to recall those assessments. Congrats on a process properly concept out and done. I cleared my SC0-402 tests.


simply attempted SC0-402 question bank as soon as and i'm convinced.
With the disburse of exceptional products of killexams.com, I had scored ninety two percentage marks in SC0-402 certification. i waslooking for liable observe fabric to boom my information stage. Technical standards and difficult language of my certification changed into hard to recognize therefore i used to exist searching for liable and clean recall a inspect atproducts. I had gain to realize this internet site for the instruction of expert certification. It was not an clean task butonly killexams.com has made this task effortless for me. im passion excellent for my achievement and this platform is satisfactory for me.


first rate source latest high-highexcellent SC0-402 irony dumps, rectify answers.
im now not an aficionado of on line killexams.com, in light of the fact that they are often posted by passage of flighty individuals who misdirect I into mastering stuff I neednt worry with and missing things that I absolutely want to recognise. not killexams.com . This commerce enterprise offers absolutely superb sized killexams.com that assist me overcome SC0-402 exam readiness. that is the passage by which I passed this exam from the second one strive and scored 87% marks. thanks


That changed into incredible! I got today's dumps present day SC0-402 examination.
There is not a superb deal SC0-402 exam substances out there, so I went in promote and purchased those SC0-402 questions and solutions. in reality, it received my coronary heart with the manner the statistics is prepared. And yeah, thats right: mostquestions I noticed on the exam believe been exactly what turned into furnished by killexams.com. Im relieved to believe exceeded SC0-402 exam.


While it is very hard task to select liable certification questions / answers resources with respect to review, reputation and validity because people accept ripoff due to choosing wrong service. Killexams.com produce it confident to serve its clients best to its resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other's ripoff report complaint clients gain to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams happily and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and attribute because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client confidence is well-known to us. Specially they recall care of killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If you see any spurious report posted by their competitors with the designation killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something like this, just preserve in irony that there are always despicable people damaging reputation of superb services due to their benefits. There are thousands of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams rehearse questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their sample questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

Back to Braindumps Menu


BCNS-CNS braindumps | E20-559 rehearse test | 000-209 dumps | COG-700 cram | M2150-810 rehearse test | 70-536-CSharp rehearse Test | NS0-150 questions answers | HP0-438 test questions | 1Z0-550 study guide | C2170-051 brain dumps | 000-765 free pdf | HP0-417 test prep | BCP-410 braindumps | 700-104 exam prep | 000-806 questions and answers | HP0-D04 study guide | 70-779 examcollection | 200-310 exam questions | C2090-612 pdf download | CTFA study guide |


SC0-402 exam questions | SC0-402 free pdf | SC0-402 pdf download | SC0-402 test questions | SC0-402 real questions | SC0-402 practice questions

Once you memorize these SC0-402 , you will accept 100% marks.
killexams.com SCP Certification observe publications are setup by means of IT experts. Lots of students had been complaining that there are too many questions in such a lot of rehearse assessments and exam guides, and they are just worn-out to believe enough money any more. Seeing killexams.com professionals labor out this comprehensive version at the same time as nonetheless assure that every one the understanding is blanketed after abysmal studies and analysis.

We believe Tested and Approved SC0-402 Exams. killexams.com provides the most accurate and latest IT exam materials which almost accommodate All knowledge points. With the aid of their SC0-402 study materials, you dont requisite to waste your time on reading bulk of reference books and just requisite to disburse 10-20 hours to master their SC0-402 true questions and answers. And they provide you with PDF Version & Software Version exam questions and answers. For Software Version materials, Its offered to give the candidates simulate the SCP SC0-402 exam in a true environment. killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for All exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
OCTSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
Click https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/SC0-402

Great SC0-402 items: they believe their specialists Team to guarantee their SCP SC0-402 exam questions are dependably the latest. They are for the most Part exceptionally restful with the exams and testing focus.

How they preserve SCP SC0-402 exams updated?: they believe their uncommon approaches to know the latest exams data on SCP SC0-402. Once in a while they contact their accomplices exceptionally acquainted with the testing focus or now and again their clients will email us the latest criticism, or they got the latest input from their dumps advertise. When they determine the SCP SC0-402 exams changed then they update them ASAP.

Unconditional promise?: on the off chance that you really gain up short this SC0-402 Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC) and don't requisite to sit taut for the update then they can give you replete refund. Yet, you ought to send your score reply to us with the goal that they can believe a check. They will give you replete refund quickly amid their working time after they accept the SCP SC0-402 score report from you.

SCP SC0-402 Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC) Product Demo?: they believe both PDF adaptation and Software variant. You can check their product page to perceive what it like.

killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for All exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
OCTSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders


At the point when will I accept my SC0-402 material after I pay?: Generally, After successful payment your username/password are sent at your email address inside 5 min. exist that as it may, if any deferral in bank side for installment approval, at that point it takes minimal longer.

SC0-402 Practice Test | SC0-402 examcollection | SC0-402 VCE | SC0-402 study guide | SC0-402 practice exam | SC0-402 cram


Killexams 156-915-70 rehearse test | Killexams P2080-034 dumps | Killexams 000-420 test prep | Killexams C2090-549 braindumps | Killexams 646-365 questions answers | Killexams HP0-068 dump | Killexams BI0-145 brain dumps | Killexams C9020-970 exam prep | Killexams 050-728 free pdf | Killexams 9A0-136 true questions | Killexams C2020-013 true questions | Killexams E20-393 free pdf download | Killexams CD0-001 brain dumps | Killexams HP0-651 cheat sheets | Killexams 70-505-CSharp free pdf | Killexams 090-602 free pdf | Killexams 000-G40 rehearse test | Killexams HP3-X02 sample test | Killexams A2180-376 braindumps | Killexams 500-170 rehearse questions |


killexams.com huge List of Exam Braindumps

View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps


Killexams HP0-171 brain dumps | Killexams 98-349 braindumps | Killexams 000-427 pdf download | Killexams JN0-692 cheat sheets | Killexams PMI-200 test prep | Killexams FNS examcollection | Killexams VCS-310 rehearse test | Killexams HP0-095 exam questions | Killexams HP0-K02 study guide | Killexams ST0-237 cram | Killexams BAS-013 rehearse test | Killexams IC3-2 study guide | Killexams P9530-089 rehearse questions | Killexams 000-002 rehearse test | Killexams C2180-181 true questions | Killexams CNOR test prep | Killexams E20-537 questions answers | Killexams 312-92 exam prep | Killexams 050-80-CASECURID01 true questions | Killexams 920-352 dump |


Network Defense and Countermeasures (NDC)

Pass 4 confident SC0-402 dumps | Killexams.com SC0-402 true questions | https://www.textbookw.com/

BAE Reveals original ‘Smart D2’ Countermeasures System | killexams.com true questions and Pass4sure dumps

BAE Systems has unveiled a next-generation threat management technology that can labor with fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft to dispense countermeasures. The company calls the original system Smart D2. It can deploy multi-shot flares, dynamic radio-frequency decoys and kinetic interceptors to protect aircraft. Traditional threat warning and countermeasure systems identify and beat infrared and guided missiles by dispensing flares or chaff that addle threats and their ability to track. BAE ...

Register now for free access to "BAE Reveals original ‘Smart D2’ Countermeasures System" and other premium content selected daily by their editors. 

Current magazine subscribers: digital access to articles associated with your subscription are now included at no added imbue to you. Simply disburse your subscriber email to log in to your account (or contact us for assistance in updating your account). Current Aviation Week Intelligence Network (AWIN) enterprise and individual members: gratify Go to http://awin.aviationweek.com for access.

Already registered? Log In here.

Computer and Network Systems (CNS): Core Programs | killexams.com true questions and Pass4sure dumps

NSF Logo

National Science Foundation

Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering     Division of Computer and Network Systems

Submission Window Date(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

     September 24, 2018 - October 02, 2018

LARGE projects

     September 24, 2018 - October 02, 2018

MEDIUM projects

     November 01, 2018 - November 15, 2018

SMALL projects

     September 09, 2019 - September 16, 2019

MEDIUM projects

     September 18, 2019 - September 25, 2019

LARGE projects

     October 31, 2019 - November 14, 2019

SMALL projects

IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND REVISION NOTES

This is a revision of NSF 17-570, the solicitation for the CISE/CNS Core Programs. Significant changes believe been made to the program description. The revisions include:

  • All proposals must exist submitted to the “CNS Core” program, rather than the Research in Networking Technology & Systems (NeTS) or Computer Systems Research (CSR) programs.
  • Additional solicitation-specific review criteria, addressing security by design, robustness, manageability, and understanding of the system or system component; evaluation of expected research outcomes; and dissemination plans for independent validation.
  • A Results Dissemination end and a Data Management end are now required for All proposals.
  • The requirement of a Collaboration end for All proposals with more than one investigator for MEDIUM proposals and All large proposals.
  • The addition of original submission taxonomy and keyword requirements; these are to exist included at the remain of the project summary.
  • The Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC) is now Part of the coordinated solicitation, along with CNS (this solicitation), Computing and Communication Foundations (CCF), and Information and bright Systems (IIS).
  • Broadening Participation in Computing plans are strongly encouraged for Medium and large proposals, and approved plans are required before award.
  • Proposers are asked not to request start dates between July 2 and September 30 of a given year.
  • Eligibility requirements for PIs, co-PIs, and senior personnel are clarified.
  • Evaluation plans are required.
  • The section on Embedded REU Supplements has been removed. Requests for REU supplements may noiseless exist submitted in accordance with applicable NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures lead (PAPPG) and CISE guidance.
  • Any proposal submitted in response to this solicitation should exist submitted in accordance with the revised NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures lead (PAPPG) (NSF 18-1), which is effectual for proposals submitted, or due, on or after January 29, 2018.

    SUMMARY OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS General Information

    Program Title:

    Computer and Network Systems (CNS): Core Programs

    Synopsis of Program:

    CISE’s Division of Computer and Network Systems (CNS) supports research and education projects that recall a system-oriented approach to the evolution of novel computing and networking technologies, or to the enhancement of existing systems in any of several dimensions, or that explore original ways to produce disburse of existing technologies.

    Proposers are invited to submit proposals in three project classes, which are defined as follows:

  • Small Projects - up to $500,000 total budget with durations up to three years;
  • Medium Projects - $500,001 to $1,200,000 total budget with durations up to four years; and
  • Large Projects - $1,200,001 to $3,000,000 total budget with durations up to five years.
  • A more complete description of the three project classes can exist create in Section II. Program Description of this document.

    Cognizant Program Officer(s):

    Please note that the following information is current at the time of publishing. see program website for any updates to the points of contact.

    Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s):

  • 47.070 --- Computer and Information Science and Engineering
  • Award Information

    Anticipated ilk of Award: gauge concede or Continuing Grant

    Estimated Number of Awards: 100 to 150

    Anticipated Funding Amount: $60,000,000

    $60 million per year, dependent upon the availability of funds.

    Eligibility Information

    Who May Submit Proposals:

    Proposals may only exist submitted by the following:

  • Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) - Two- and four-year IHEs (including community colleges) accredited in, and having a campus located in the US, acting on behalf of their faculty members. Special Instructions for International offshoot Campuses of US IHEs: If the proposal includes funding to exist provided to an international offshoot campus of a US institution of higher education (including through disburse of subawards and consultant arrangements), the proposer must expound the benefit(s) to the project of performance at the international offshoot campus, and justify why the project activities cannot exist performed at the US campus.
  • Non-profit, non-academic organizations: Independent museums, observatories, research labs, professional societies and similar organizations in the U.S. associated with educational or research activities.
  • Who May Serve as PI:

    As of the submission deadline, PIs, co-PIs, or other senior project personnel must hold primary, full-time, paid appointments in research or teaching positions at US-based campuses/offices of organizations eligible to submit to this solicitation (see above), with exceptions granted for family or medical leave, as determined by the submitting institution. Individuals with primary appointments at for-profit, non-academic organizations, or overseas offshoot campuses of US IHEs are not eligible, even if they moreover believe an appointment at a US campus.

    Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization:

    There are no restrictions or limits.

    Limit on Number of Proposals per PI or Co-PI: 2

    In any contiguous September through November period, an individual may participate as PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel in no more than two proposals across All size classes submitted in response to the coordinated solicitations (where coordinated solicitations are defined to involve the Computer and Network Systems (CNS): Core Programs, Computing and Communication Foundations (CCF): Core Programs, Information and bright Systems (IIS): Core Programs, and the Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC): Core Programs solicitations). For example, between September 2018 and November 2018, an individual may participate as PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel in one proposal submitted to a core program in CCF and in a second proposal submitted to a core program in CNS, or an individual may participate as PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel in two proposals submitted to an IIS core program, etc.

    These eligibility constraints will exist strictly enforced in order to handle everyone fairly and consistently. In the event that an individual exceeds this limit, proposals received within the confine will exist accepted based on earliest date and time of proposal submission (i.e., the first two proposals received will exist accepted and the relaxation will exist returned without review). No exceptions will exist made.

    The confine on the number of proposals per PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel applies only to the coordinated solicitations.

    Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions

    A. Proposal Preparation Instructions

  • Letters of Intent: Not required
  • Preliminary Proposal Submission: Not required
  • B. Budgetary Information

  • Other Budgetary Limitations:

    Other budgetary limitations apply. gratify see the replete text of this solicitation for further information.

  • C. Due Dates

  • Submission Window Date(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

         September 24, 2018 - October 02, 2018

    LARGE projects

         September 24, 2018 - October 02, 2018

    MEDIUM projects

         November 01, 2018 - November 15, 2018

    SMALL projects

         September 09, 2019 - September 16, 2019

    MEDIUM projects

         September 18, 2019 - September 25, 2019

    LARGE projects

         October 31, 2019 - November 14, 2019

    SMALL projects

  • Proposal Review Information Criteria

    Merit Review Criteria:

    National Science Board approved criteria. Additional merit review considerations apply. gratify see the replete text of this solicitation for further information.

    Award Administration Information

    Award Conditions:

    Standard NSF award conditions apply.

    Reporting Requirements:

    Standard NSF reporting requirements apply.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Summary of Program Requirements

  • Introduction
  • Program Description
  • Award Information
  • Eligibility Information
  • Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions
  • Proposal Preparation Instructions
  • Budgetary Information
  • Due Dates
  • FastLane/Grants.gov Requirements
  • NSF Proposal Processing and Review Procedures
  • Merit Review Principles and Criteria
  • Review and Selection Process
  • Award Administration Information
  • Notification of the Award
  • Award Conditions
  • Reporting Requirements
  • Agency Contacts
  • Other Information
  • I. INTRODUCTION

    The Division of Computer and Network Systems (CNS) supports research and education activities that lead to novel or enhanced computing and networking technologies, or that explore original ways to produce disburse of existing technologies. The Division seeks to develop a better understanding of the fundamental properties and tradeoffs involved in computer and network systems as well as the abstractions and tools used in designing, building, measuring, and using them.

    II. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

    The CNS core program deals with All aspects of computer and network systems. Society's reliance on such systems as infrastructure has grown dramatically in the last decade. At the same time, both the resources from which those systems are built—compute, storage, communication networks, and software—and the passage those resources are organized and distributed, believe continued to evolve rapidly.

    Current and future systems requisite to fill various requirements, both generic and purpose-driven. general system requirements involve security, reliability, manageability, usability, and sustainability, as well as cost-effectiveness and fitness for purpose. Depending on the context, other requirements may involve performance, privacy-preservation, scalability, responsiveness, and survivability.

    CNS solicits innovative research that considers technology trends and emerging challenges, while emphasizing a systems focus and awareness of the types of requirements mentioned above. This solicitation recognizes the interdependency and blurring of boundaries among computing, storage, and networking (sub)systems and the research associated with them. As such, specific sub-programs are not called out. It is not the intent to confine the scope of the program, compared to previous solicitations. Rather, the intent is to inspirit cross-fertilization among areas of CNS research.

    Research of interest for this solicitation:

  • Explores fundamental principles and creates innovative technologies, protocols, and systems that define the future or—more realistically—harness current and emerging technologies, trends, and applications;
  • Produces practical abstractions, techniques, tools, artifacts, or datasets that address/enhance both general and functional requirements such as those outlined above;
  • Reflects a pellucid understanding of what each component does and how it interfaces with the relaxation of the system and the environment;
  • Disseminates artifacts in such a passage that others can repeat, reproduce, validate, or otherwise verify the results.
  • Although purely intellectual investigations are within scope, research that takes into account current and future societal needs is encouraged.

    A hallmark of systems research is the investigation and understanding of design tradeoffs that must exist navigated when designing and implementing systems against the requirements above. Proposals that expose underlying principles or tradeoffs having predictive value that extends across different domains are especially encouraged. Proposers should identify and characterize the systems considered, the objectives or capabilities envisioned, and their expected contribution in the context of the overall system requirements. Three especially well-known sample requirements are:

  • Secure by design: How can one ensure integrity and confidentiality of networked systems and data? How can one enhance abstractions, delineate permissible actions, invoke compliance, and establish security defaults in design processes that anticipate vulnerabilities and provide defense against unforeseen attacks from adversaries?
  • Robustness: How can systems—existing and future—be made more adaptable and resilient to natural and anthropogenic hazards (e.g., weather events, malware, sabotage), as well as other everyday or expected events, such as component failures, misconfigurations, and overloads? What innovative approaches would enable one to ensure system robustness and to identify, communicate, and mitigate system anomalies in real-time for outages at both petite and large scale?
  • Manageability: What original architectures and protocols, measurement and monitoring capabilities are needed to uphold a growing set of diverse applications? How can these measurements and monitoring capabilities aid in overall system management? What are novel approaches to enable comprehensive, pervasive, accurate, and usable measurement capabilities, near real-time system analytics, and systems management when the systems are massive and at the scale of the Internet? What innovations are needed to enable truly autonomous systems, which are self-managing by definition?
  • In general, any topic having to achieve with augmenting, understanding, enhancing, or transforming computing and communication systems undertaken from a systems point of view is within scope.

    Issues that reside primarily at the device or application smooth and that are highly context-specific will not exist considered a superb suitable for this program. Projects that focus exclusively or primarily on cybersecurity threats and countermeasures may exist a better suitable for the Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC) program. Projects focused primarily on design or enhancement of sensing and control systems that interact with the physical world may exist a better suitable with the Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) program.

    Project Validation Plan: Proposers are strongly encouraged to involve a project validation end in the Project Description that characterize the underlying setup, processes, mechanisms, and metrics to assess success of the proposed research. Proposers may validate hypotheses using simulations, emulations, testbeds, or a combination of these; architectural validation could happen at a time-scale larger than the project duration, in which case the approach to long-term architecture validation must exist discussed in the proposal. Proposers are highly recommended to use, when appropriate, the wide array of community infrastructure testbeds that are available as Part of their validation plan. The proposal must produce pellucid the intended smooth of abstraction at which the underlying research will exist validated.

    Results Dissemination Plan: Proposals submitted to this solicitation must characterize plans to ensure that the research results produced will exist made available to the extent necessary to validate the findings independently, as indicated in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures lead (PAPPG) Chapter XI.D.4.

    Data Management Plan: The data management end must moreover characterize steps to ensure that material software and hardware artifacts, data and the results are available (for a reasonable time) beyond the remain of the project lifecycle. For details, see the Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering (CISE) Data Management end at https://www.nsf.gov/cise/cise_dmp.jsp.

    Collaboration Plan: Since the success of collaborative research efforts is known to depend on attentive coordination mechanisms that regularly bring together the various participants of the project, a divide Collaboration end is required for All large proposals and All Medium proposals with more than one investigator. Collaboration Plans are optional for petite proposals.

    PROJECT CLASSES

    Proposals submitted to this solicitation must exist consistent with one of three project classes defined below. Proposals will exist considered for funding within their project classes.

  • SMALL Projects
  • Small Projects, with total budgets up to $500,000 for durations of up to three years, are well suited to one or two investigators (PI and one co-PI or other Senior Personnel) and at least one student and/or postdoc. A Collaboration end (up to 2 pages) may exist provided under Supplementary Documents. gratify see Proposal Preparation Instructions Section V.A for additional submission guidelines.

  • MEDIUM Projects
  • Medium Projects, with total budgets ranging from $500,001 to $1,200,000 for durations up to four years, are well suited to one or more investigators (PI, co-PI and/or other Senior Personnel) and several students and/or postdocs. Medium project descriptions must exist comprehensive and well-integrated, and should produce a convincing case that the collaborative contributions of the project team will exist greater than the sum of each of their individual contributions. Rationale must exist provided to expound why a budget of this size is required to carry out the proposed work. Since the success of collaborative research efforts are known to depend on attentive coordination mechanisms that regularly bring together the various participants of the project, a Collaboration end is required for any Medium project with more than one investigator, even when the investigators are affiliated with the same institution. Up to 2 pages are allowed for Collaboration Plans and they must exist submitted as a document under Supplementary Documents. The length and smooth of detail provided in the Collaboration end should exist commensurate with the complexity of the proposed project. Collaboration Plans and proposed budgets should demonstrate that key personnel, and especially lead PIs, believe allocated adequate time for both their individual technical contributions and the leadership of collaborative activities necessary to realize the synergistic effects of larger-scale research. If a Medium project with more than one investigator does not involve a Collaboration Plan, that proposal will exist returned without review. gratify see Proposal Preparation Instructions Section V.A for additional submission guidelines.

  • LARGE Projects
  • Large Projects, with total budgets ranging from $1,200,001 to $3,000,000 for durations of up to five years, are well suited to two or more investigators (PI, co-PI(s), or other Senior Personnel), and a team of students and/or postdocs. large project descriptions must exist comprehensive and well-integrated, and should produce a convincing case that the collaborative contributions of the project team will exist greater than the sum of each of their individual contributions. large projects will typically integrate research from various areas, either within a cluster or across clusters, or tackle ambitious goals not feasible with smaller projects. Rationale must exist provided to expound why a budget of this size is required to carry out the proposed work. Since the success of collaborative research efforts are known to depend on attentive coordination mechanisms that regularly bring together the various participants of the project, a Collaboration end is required for All large projects, regardless of the number of investigators. Up to 2 pages are allowed for Collaboration Plans and they must exist submitted as a document under Supplementary Documents. The length and degree of detail provided in the Collaboration end should exist commensurate with the complexity of the proposed project. Collaboration Plans and proposed budgets should demonstrate that key personnel, and especially lead PIs, believe allocated adequate time for both their individual technical contributions and the leadership of collaborative activities necessary to realize the synergistic effects of larger-scale research. If a large project does not involve a Collaboration Plan, that proposal will exist returned without review. gratify see Proposal Preparation Instructions Section V.A for additional submission guidelines.

  • EVALUATION PLANS

    PIs must involve a end to evaluate the approaches developed as Part of the Project Description. Evaluation methods will depend on the research area; examples involve results from evolution of theories, applications of techniques to specific domains, efficacy studies, scalability on local or global scales, generalization, quantifiable usability, robustness, reliability in benign or hostile environments, compatibility with existing environments, performance measures on benchmark datasets, and other such activities. The end should exist usurp for the size and scope of the project.

    BROADENING PARTICIPATION IN COMPUTING

    CISE has long been committed to Broadening Participation in Computing (BPC). The under-representation of many groups—including women, African Americans, Hispanics, American Indians, Alaska Natives, native Hawaiians, native Pacific Islanders, and persons with disabilities—in computing deprives large segments of the population of the break to exist creators of technology and not only consumers. Ending underrepresentation will require a sweep of measures, including institutional programs and activities as well as culture change across colleges, departments, classes, and research groups.

    With this solicitation, CISE is expanding a pilot pains started last year encouraging the research community to engage in meaningful BPC activities. This original activity builds on many of the programs, research, and resources created in CISE's long history of uphold for BPC, and it aligns with the recommendations of the Strategic end for Broadening Participation produced by the CISE Advisory Committee in 2011. Specifically:

  • Each Medium and large project must, by the time of award, believe in station an approved BPC plan. In this ongoing pilot phase, CISE will labor with each PI team following merit review and prior to making an award to ensure that plans are meaningful and involve concrete metrics for success. CISE will moreover provide opportunities for PIs to share BPC experiences and innovations through program PI meetings. PIs of Medium and large proposals are therefore strongly encouraged to account this eventual requirement as they develop their proposals, and to involve one- to three-page descriptions of their planned BPC activities under Supplementary Documents in their submissions. Feedback will exist provided on such plans.
  • PIs submitting to the petite size class should note that CISE intends to conduct an evaluation of the effectiveness of the above approach and determine usurp next steps, including potential further expansion of this pains in future years. PIs of petite proposals are therefore strongly encouraged to involve plans, or commence preparing to involve plans, for broadening participation activities in their proposals.
  • More information, including examples of BPC activities and metrics, can exist create at: https://www.nsf.gov/cise/bpc/.

    PROPOSALS FOR CONSIDERATION BY MULTIPLE CISE PROGRAMS

    Proposals that intersect more than one CISE research program are welcome. In such cases, PIs must identify the most material programs in the proposal submission process (for information about submission and how to identify such proposals, see Proposal Preparation Instructions later in this document). CISE Program Officers will ensure that these proposals are co-reviewed as appropriate.

    IMPORTANT PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS

    The submission of far-reaching, creative research and education projects is encouraged. Funds will exist used to uphold potentially transformative research with high-impact potential. In this way, CISE will catalyze exciting original research activities with the potential to produce significant advances in the condition of the art.

    Interdisciplinary, international, and/or academic-industry collaborations that plight to result in major science or engineering advances are welcome. The directorate hopes to attract proposals from faculty at a broad sweep of academic institutions, including faculty at minority-serving and predominantly undergraduate institutions.

    Proposals submitted should demonstrate that rich learning experiences will exist provided for a diverse population of students and may propound the evolution of innovative curricula or educational materials that promote literacy about and expertise in areas supported by CISE.

    Scientific progress often results by considering a special case of a general problem. If the proposed research falls into this category, PIs can allay the reviewers and NSF staff better understand the intellectual merit and/or broader impacts of the proposal by discussing to what extent the findings are likely to generalize.

    In the interest of completeness and transparency, PIs are strongly encouraged to describe, as Part of their Data Management Plans, how they will provide access to well-documented datasets, modeling and/or simulation tools, and codebases to uphold reproducibility of their methods. For more information, see the Dear Colleague missive “Encouraging Reproducibility in Computing and Communications Research” available at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf17022.

    START DATES

    In order to avoid overdue reports blocking award actions during the remain of a fiscal year, institutions are discouraged from seeking project start dates between July 2 and September 30 of a given year. Awardee institutions may incur allowable pre-award costs within the 90-day epoch immediately preceding the start date of the concede matter to the conditions specified in the PAPPG; this will allow uphold for students or other material activities to commence over this period.

    III. AWARD INFORMATION

    Up to $60 million each year will uphold up to 150 awards, pending the availability of funds.

    IV. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION

    Who May Submit Proposals:

    Proposals may only exist submitted by the following:

  • Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) - Two- and four-year IHEs (including community colleges) accredited in, and having a campus located in the US, acting on behalf of their faculty members. Special Instructions for International offshoot Campuses of US IHEs: If the proposal includes funding to exist provided to an international offshoot campus of a US institution of higher education (including through disburse of subawards and consultant arrangements), the proposer must expound the benefit(s) to the project of performance at the international offshoot campus, and justify why the project activities cannot exist performed at the US campus.
  • Non-profit, non-academic organizations: Independent museums, observatories, research labs, professional societies and similar organizations in the U.S. associated with educational or research activities.
  • Who May Serve as PI:

    As of the submission deadline, PIs, co-PIs, or other senior project personnel must hold primary, full-time, paid appointments in research or teaching positions at US-based campuses/offices of organizations eligible to submit to this solicitation (see above), with exceptions granted for family or medical leave, as determined by the submitting institution. Individuals with primary appointments at for-profit, non-academic organizations, or overseas offshoot campuses of US IHEs are not eligible, even if they moreover believe an appointment at a US campus.

    Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization:

    There are no restrictions or limits.

    Limit on Number of Proposals per PI or Co-PI: 2

    In any contiguous September through November period, an individual may participate as PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel in no more than two proposals across All size classes submitted in response to the coordinated solicitations (where coordinated solicitations are defined to involve the Computer and Network Systems (CNS): Core Programs, Computing and Communication Foundations (CCF): Core Programs, Information and bright Systems (IIS): Core Programs, and the Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC): Core Programs solicitations). For example, between September 2018 and November 2018, an individual may participate as PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel in one proposal submitted to a core program in CCF and in a second proposal submitted to a core program in CNS, or an individual may participate as PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel in two proposals submitted to an IIS core program, etc.

    These eligibility constraints will exist strictly enforced in order to handle everyone fairly and consistently. In the event that an individual exceeds this limit, proposals received within the confine will exist accepted based on earliest date and time of proposal submission (i.e., the first two proposals received will exist accepted and the relaxation will exist returned without review). No exceptions will exist made.

    The confine on the number of proposals per PI, co-PI or Senior Personnel applies only to the coordinated solicitations.

    Additional Eligibility Info:

    Subawards are not permitted to overseas offshoot campuses/offices of US-based proposing organizations eligible to submit to this solicitation.

    V. PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS A. Proposal Preparation Instructions

    Full Proposal Preparation Instructions: Proposers may opt to submit proposals in response to this Program Solicitation via Grants.gov or via the NSF FastLane system.

  • Full proposals submitted via FastLane: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation should exist prepared and submitted in accordance with the general guidelines contained in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures lead (PAPPG). The complete text of the PAPPG is available electronically on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg. Paper copies of the PAPPG may exist obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from nsfpubs@nsf.gov. Proposers are reminded to identify this program solicitation number in the program solicitation screen on the NSF Cover Sheet For Proposal to the National Science Foundation. Compliance with this requirement is faultfinding to determining the material proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information may delay processing.
  • Full proposals submitted via Grants.gov: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation via Grants.gov should exist prepared and submitted in accordance with the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide: A lead for the Preparation and Submission of NSF Applications via Grants.gov. The complete text of the NSF Grants.gov Application lead is available on the Grants.gov website and on the NSF website at: (https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=grantsgovguide). To obtain copies of the Application lead and Application Forms Package, click on the Apply tab on the Grants.gov site, then click on the Apply Step 1: Download a concede Application Package and Application Instructions link and enter the funding break number, (the program solicitation number without the NSF prefix) and press the Download Package button. Paper copies of the Grants.gov Application lead moreover may exist obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from nsfpubs@nsf.gov.
  • In determining which mode to utilize in the electronic preparation and submission of the proposal, gratify note the following:

    Collaborative Proposals. All collaborative proposals submitted as divide submissions from multiple organizations must exist submitted via the NSF FastLane system. PAPPG Chapter II.D.3 provides additional information on collaborative proposals.

    See PAPPG Chapter II.C.2 for guidance on the required sections of a replete research proposal submitted to NSF. gratify note that the proposal preparation instructions provided in this program solicitation may deviate from the PAPPG instructions.

    The following information SUPPLEMENTS (note that it does NOT replace) the guidelines provided in the NSF.

    Cover Sheet: PIs submitting concede Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI) proposals should select “GOALI” from the ilk of Proposal drop down list in the Proposal Preparation module in FastLane or Grants.gov. gratify see Chapter II.E.4 of the PAPPG for additional information about preparing a GOALI proposal: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappg17_1/pappg_2.jsp#IIE4.

    Proposal Titles:

    Proposal titles should commence with "CNS Core", followed with a colon, then the project class followed by a colon, then the title of your project. For example, if you are submitting a Medium proposal, then your title would exist CNS Core: Medium: Title.

    If you submit a proposal as Part of a set of collaborative proposals, the title of the proposal should commence with "CNS Core" followed by a colon, then the project class followed by a colon, then "Collaborative Research" followed by a colon, and the title. For example, if you are submitting a collaborative set of proposals for a large project the title of each would exist CNS Core: Large: Collaborative Research: Title.

    Proposals from PIs in institutions that believe RUI (Research in Undergraduate Institutions) eligibility should believe a proposal title that begins "CNS Core", followed by a colon then the project class, followed by a colon then "RUI", followed by a colon and then the title, for example, CNS Core: Small: RUI: Title.

    PIs submitting GOALI proposals should believe a proposal title that begins "CNS Core", followed by a colon then the project class, followed by a colon then "GOALI", followed by a colon and then the title, for example, CNS Core: Small: GOALI: Title.

    Proposals that extend beyond the scope of one CISE core program or locality are welcome. Proposals should exist submitted in response to the solicitation for the CISE division (CCF, CNS, IIS, or OAC) that includes the most material core program. In such cases, PIs should identify the acronym for the most material core program or area, followed by any other material program acronym(s) separated by colons (for example, CNS Core: CHS: Medium: Title). In this case, the proposal would exist submitted to the CNS solicitation and would exist considered by both the CNS Core and Cyber-Human Systems (CHS) programs. CNS Program Officers will labor with their NSF and CISE colleagues to ensure that these proposals are appropriately reviewed and considered for funding. gratify see the coordinated CCF, IIS, and OAC solicitations for information on other CISE core programs and the corresponding acronyms.

    Project Summary:

    The Project Summary consists of an overview, a statement on the intellectual merit of the proposed activity, a statement on the broader impacts of the proposed activity, and a set of keywords.

    To assist the proposers and the NSF in identifying a “home” for submissions to this program, proposers are required to select keywords in each of the following four dimensions. The first dimension describes the most material systems topic area; the second dimension identifies the context or class of systems; the third dimension corresponds to the primary goal or objective of the proposed work, and the fourth indicates any specialized knowledge or techniques to exist applied (for sample machine learning, game theory, etc.). Proposers must select at least one keyword from each list below for the first three dimensions; the fourth dimension should exist filled in if any specialized technique is proposed, otherwise "none" should exist indicated.

    The required keywords should exist input in order, with each dimension delimited by square brackets ("[" and "]"), and multiple keywords within a dimension separated by commas.

    Dimension 1: Topic Area

  • Compilers and Programming Languages
  • Computer Architecture
  • Distributed Systems
  • File Systems
  • Middleware/Services
  • Operating Systems
  • Software Defined Infrastructure/Virtualization
  • Wired Networks
  • Wireless Networks
  • Dimension 2: Target Context or Platform Class

  • Access Networks
  • Application Services
  • Content Delivery Networks
  • Data hub Networks
  • Mobile Systems
  • Cluster/Data Center
  • Cloud/Edge
  • Enterprise Networks
  • High Performance Computing
  • Network Architecture
  • Network Protocols
  • Optical Networks
  • Storage Systems
  • Vehicular Networks
  • Dimension 3: Target Requirement

  • Cost
  • Fairness
  • Quality of (experience, service)
  • Manageability
  • Measurability
  • Performance (throughput, latency)
  • Power/energy improvements
  • Real-time
  • Reliability
  • Robustness
  • Security
  • Scalability
  • Spectrum Coexistence
  • Dimension 4: Techniques

    Projects contemplating application of particular knowledge or techniques (e.g., graph theory, game theory, control theory, machine learning, network coding, formal methods, and so on) should involve keywords to argue the specialized knowledge to exist applied.

    Up to 6 additional proposal specific keywords may exist added following these four required classifiers, without square bracket delimiters.

    For example, a proposal to disburse machine learning to develop low-cost file system abstractions for content delivery in low-latency edge environments might believe the following string in the Keywords field:

    [File Systems] [Access Networks] [Cost, Performance] [machine learning]

    A project focused on compilers to enhance manageability in enterprise networks could believe the following as Keywords:

    [Compilers and Programming Languages] [Enterprise Networks] [Manageability] [none]

    A proposal on mmWave beamforming using machine learning could believe the following Keywords:

    [Wireless Networks] [Access Networks] [Performance] [Machine Learning] mmWave, Beamforming

    The list of keywords should exist the last paragraph of the Overview section of the Project Summary.

    Project Description:

    Length of Project Description - characterize the research and education activities to exist undertaken in up to 15 pages for petite and Medium proposals and in up to 20 pages for large proposals. Proposals that exceed these limits will exist returned without review.

    PIs submitting to the petite size class should note that CISE intends to conduct an evaluation of the effectiveness of the BPC pilot approach and determine usurp next steps, including potential further expansion of this pains in future years. PIs of petite proposals are therefore strongly encouraged to involve plans, or commence preparing to involve plans, for broadening participation activities in the Broader Impacts sections of their proposals.

    Supplementary Documents:

    In the Supplementary Documents section, upload the following information where relevant:

  • A list of Project Personnel and ally Institutions (Note: In collaborative proposals, the lead institution should provide this information for All participants):
  • Provide current, accurate information for All personnel and institutions involved in the project. NSF staff will disburse this information in the merit review process to manage reviewer selection. The list must involve All PIs, Co-PIs, Senior Personnel, paid/unpaid Consultants or Collaborators, Subawardees, Postdocs, and project-level advisory committee members. This list should exist numbered and involve (in this order) replete name, Organization(s), and Role in the project, with each detail separated by a semi-colon. Each person listed should start a original numbered line. For example:

  • Mary Smith; XYZ University; PI
  • John Jones; University of PQR; Senior Personnel
  • Jane Brown; XYZ University; Postdoc
  • Bob Adams; ABC Community College; Paid Consultant
  • Susan White; DEF Corporation; Unpaid Collaborator
  • Tim Green; ZZZ University; Subawardee
  • Note: In collaborative proposals, the lead institution should provide this information for All participants.

    Since the success of collaborative research efforts are known to depend on attentive coordination mechanisms that regularly bring together the various participants of the project, All Medium proposals that involve more than one investigator and All large proposals must involve a Collaboration end of up to 2 pages. The length of and degree of detail provided in the Collaboration end should exist commensurate with the complexity of the proposed project. Where appropriate, the Collaboration end might include: 1) the specific roles of the project participants in All organizations involved; 2) information on how the project will exist managed across All the investigators, institutions, and/or disciplines; 3) identification of the specific coordination mechanisms that will enable cross-investigator, cross-institution, and/or cross-discipline scientific integration (e.g., yearly conferences, graduate student exchange, project meetings at conferences, disburse of the grid for videoconferences, software repositories, etc.); and 4) specific references to the budget line items that uphold collaboration and coordination mechanisms. If a large proposal, or a Medium proposal with more than one investigator, does not involve a Collaboration end of up to 2 pages, that proposal will exist returned without review.

  • Collaboration Plans for Medium and large projects (if applicable):

    Proposals must involve a Supplementary Document of no more than two pages labeled "Data Management Plan." This Supplementary Document should characterize how the proposal will conform to NSF policy on the dissemination and sharing of research results.

    See Chapter II.C.2.j of the PAPPG for replete policy implementation.

    For additional information on the Dissemination and Sharing of Research Results, see: https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp.

    For specific guidance for Data Management Plans submitted to the Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CISE) see: https://www.nsf.gov/cise/cise_dmp.jsp.

  • Data Management end (required):

    Proposals submitted to this solicitation must characterize plans to ensure that the research results produced will exist made available to the extent necessary to validate the findings independently, as indicated in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures lead (PAPPG) Chapter XI.D.4.

  • Results Dissemination end (required):

    Each Medium/Large project must, by the time of award, believe in station an approved BPC plan. In this ongoing pilot phase, CISE will labor with each PI team prior to making an award to ensure that plans are meaningful and involve concrete metrics for success. CISE will moreover provide opportunities for PIs to share BPC experiences and innovations through program PI meetings. PIs of Medium/Large proposals are therefore strongly encouraged to account this eventual requirement as they develop their proposals, and to involve descriptions (of one to three pages) of their planned BPC activities under Supplementary Documents in their submissions. Feedback will exist provided on such plans.

  • Broadening Participation in Computing (BPC) Plans for Medium and large projects:

    There are two types of collaboration, one involving individuals/organizations that are included in the budget, and the other involving individuals/organizations that are not included in the budget. Collaborations that are included in the budget should exist described in the Project Description. Any substantial collaboration with individuals/organizations not included in the budget should exist described in the Facilities, rig and Other Resources section of the proposal (see PAPPG Chapter II.C.2.i). In either case, whether or not the collaborator is included in the budget, a missive of collaboration from each named participating organization other than the submitting lead, non-lead, and/or subawardee institutions should exist provided at the time of submission of the proposal. Such letters should explicitly condition the nature of the collaboration, loom on the organization's letterhead and exist signed by the usurp organizational representative. These letters must not otherwise deviate from the restrictions and requirements set forth in the PAPPG, Chapter II.C.2.j.

    Please note that letters of uphold may not exist submitted. Such letters achieve not document collaborative arrangements of significance to the project, but primarily convey a sense of enthusiasm for the project and/or highlight the qualifications of the PI or co-PI. Reviewers will exist instructed not to account these letters of uphold in reviewing the merits of the proposal.

  • Documentation of collaborative arrangements of significance to the proposal through Letters of Collaboration:

    RUI Proposals: PIs from predominantly undergraduate institutions should involve a Research in Undergraduate Institutions (RUI) impact Statement and Certification of RUI Eligibility in this section.

    GOALI proposals: PIs submitting GOALI proposals should involve industry-university agreement letters on intellectual property in this section.

    No other Supplementary Documents, except as permitted by the NSF PAPPG, are allowed.

    Single Copy Documents:

    Collaborators and Other Affiliations Information:

    Proposers should supervene the guidance specified in Chapter II.C.1.e of the NSF PAPPG.

    Note the distinction to detail (1) under Supplementary Documents above: the listing of All project participants is collected by the project lead and entered as a Supplementary Document, which is then automatically included with All proposals in a project. The Collaborators and Other Affiliations are entered for each participant within each proposal and, as lone Copy Documents, are available only to NSF staff.

    Collaborators and Other Affiliations due to participants listed on detail (1) under Supplementary Documents above who are not PIs, co-PIs, or Senior Personnel can exist uploaded under Additional lone Copy Documents using Transfer File.

  • Other specialized information:
  • Submission Checklist:

    In an pains to assist proposal preparation, the following checklists are provided as a reminder of the items that should exist checked before submitting a proposal to this solicitation. These are a summary of the requirements described above. For the items marked with (RWR), the proposal will exist returned without review if the required detail is noncompliant at the submission deadline. Note that there are four lists: (1) for All proposals, unique to this solicitation; (2) additional requirements for petite proposals; (3) additional requirements for Medium proposals; and (4) additional requirements for large proposals.

  • For All proposals, regardless of size:
  • All proposals must exist submitted to the “CNS Core” program, rather than the Research in Networking Technology & Systems (NeTS) or Computer Systems Research (CSR) programs.
  • Should involve a Results Dissemination end and Data Management Plan.
  • The Project Summary must accommodate the set of required dimensional keywords, input in order, with each dimension delimited by square brackets ("[" and "]"), and multiple keywords within a dimension separated by commas.
  • The title should start with one of the following strings (submissions intended for CNS and moreover additional core programs described in the CCF, IIS, or OAC core solicitations should supervene a similar pattern):
  • CNS Core: Small:
  • CNS Core: Small: Collaborative:
  • In addition to the above title prefixes, proposals from PIs in institutions that believe RUI (Research in Undergraduate Institutions) eligibility should involve "RUI:" immediately before the proposal title, for example, CNS Core: Small: RUI: Title, and should involve a Research in Undergraduate Institutions impact Statement and Certification of RUI Eligibility. Similarly, PIs submitting concede Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI) proposals should select “GOALI” from the ilk of Proposal drop down list in the Proposal Preparation module in FastLane or Grants.gov; and involve "GOALI:" immediately before the proposal title, for example, CNS Core: Small: GOALI: Title.
  • (RWR) Maximum budget shown on the Cover Sheet and on the budget pages must not exceed $500,000, including All institutions in a collaborative proposal, plus funds for embedded REU supplements.
  • (RWR) The Project Description is limited to no more than 15 pages.
  • A Collaboration end (up to 2 pages) may exist provided as a Supplementary Document. If provided, the collaboration end should involve All institutions participating, not a divide end for each institution.
  • For petite proposals:
  • The title should start with one of the following strings (submissions intended for CNS and moreover additional core programs described in the in the CCF, IIS, or OAC core solicitations should supervene a similar pattern):
  • CNS Core: Medium:
  • CNS Core: Medium: Collaborative:
  • In addition to the above title prefixes, proposals from PIs in institutions that believe RUI (Research in Undergraduate Institutions) eligibility should involve "RUI:" immediately before the proposal title, for example, CNS Core: Medium: RUI: Title, and should involve a Research in Undergraduate Institutions impact Statement and Certification of RUI Eligibility. Similarly, PIs submitting concede Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI) proposals should select “GOALI” from the ilk of Proposal drop down list in the Proposal Preparation module in FastLane or Grants.gov; and involve "GOALI:" immediately before the proposal title, for example, CNS Core: Medium: GOALI: Title.
  • (RWR) The budget shown on the Cover Sheet and on the budget pages must exist $500,001 to $1,200,000, including All institutions in a collaborative proposal, plus funds for embedded REU supplements.
  • (RWR) The Project Description is limited to no more than 15 pages.
  • (RWR) If there is more than one investigator, a Collaboration end (up to 2 pages) must exist provided as a Supplementary Document, even if All investigators are affiliated with the same institution. The Collaboration end should involve All institutions participating, not a divide end for each institution.
  • A BPC end (of one to three pages) should exist provided as a Supplementary Document.
  • For Medium proposals:
  • The title should start with one of the following strings (submissions intended for CNS and moreover additional core programs described in the CCF, IIS, or OAC core solicitations should supervene a similar pattern, assuming that All listed programs are accepting large proposals):
  • CNS Core: Large:
  • CNS Core: Large: Collaborative:
  • In addition to the above title prefixes, proposals from PIs in institutions that believe RUI (Research in Undergraduate Institutions) eligibility should involve "RUI:" immediately before the proposal title, for example, CNS Core: Large: RUI: Title, and should involve a Research in Undergraduate Institutions impact Statement and Certification of RUI Eligibility. Similarly, PIs submitting concede Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI) proposals should select “GOALI” from the ilk of Proposal drop down list in the Proposal Preparation module in FastLane or Grants.gov; and involve "GOALI:" immediately before the proposal title, for example, CNS Core: Large: GOALI: Title.
  • (RWR) The budget shown on the Cover Sheet and on the budget pages must exist $1,200,001 to $3,000,000, including All institutions in a collaborative proposal, plus funds for embedded REU supplements.
  • (RWR) The Project Description is limited to no more than 20 pages.
  • (RWR) A Collaboration end (up to 2 pages) must exist provided as a Supplementary Document, even if All investigators are affiliated with the same institution. The Collaboration end should involve All institutions participating, not a divide end for each institution.
  • A BPC end (of one to three pages) should exist provided as a Supplementary Document.
  • For large proposals:
  • Proposals that achieve not comply with the requirements marked as RWR will exist returned without review.

    B. Budgetary Information

    Cost Sharing:

    Inclusion of deliberate committed cost sharing is prohibited.

    Other Budgetary Limitations:

    Other budgetary limitations apply. gratify see the replete text of this solicitation for further information.

    C. Due Dates
  • Submission Window Date(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

         September 24, 2018 - October 02, 2018

    LARGE projects

         September 24, 2018 - October 02, 2018

    MEDIUM projects

         November 01, 2018 - November 15, 2018

    SMALL projects

         September 09, 2019 - September 16, 2019

    MEDIUM projects

         September 18, 2019 - September 25, 2019

    LARGE projects

         October 31, 2019 - November 14, 2019

    SMALL projects

  • D. FastLane/Grants.gov Requirements

    For Proposals Submitted Via FastLane:

    To prepare and submit a proposal via FastLane, see detailed technical instructions available at: https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm. For FastLane user support, summon the FastLane allay Desk at 1-800-673-6188 or e-mail fastlane@nsf.gov. The FastLane allay Desk answers general technical questions related to the disburse of the FastLane system. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should exist referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this funding opportunity.

    For Proposals Submitted Via Grants.gov:

    Before using Grants.gov for the first time, each organization must register to create an institutional profile. Once registered, the applicant's organization can then apply for any federal concede on the Grants.gov website. Comprehensive information about using Grants.gov is available on the Grants.gov Applicant Resources webpage: http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants.html. In addition, the NSF Grants.gov Application lead (see link in Section V.A) provides instructions regarding the technical preparation of proposals via Grants.gov. For Grants.gov user support, contact the Grants.gov Contact hub at 1-800-518-4726 or by email: support@grants.gov. The Grants.gov Contact hub answers general technical questions related to the disburse of Grants.gov. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should exist referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this solicitation.

    Submitting the Proposal: Once All documents believe been completed, the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must submit the application to Grants.gov and verify the desired funding break and agency to which the application is submitted. The AOR must then mark and submit the application to Grants.gov. The completed application will exist transferred to the NSF FastLane system for further processing.

    Proposers that submitted via FastLane are strongly encouraged to disburse FastLane to verify the status of their submission to NSF. For proposers that submitted via Grants.gov, until an application has been received and validated by NSF, the Authorized Organizational Representative may check the status of an application on Grants.gov. After proposers believe received an e-mail notification from NSF, Research.gov should exist used to check the status of an application.

    VI. NSF PROPOSAL PROCESSING AND REVIEW PROCEDURES

    Proposals received by NSF are assigned to the usurp NSF program for acknowledgement and, if they meet NSF requirements, for review. All proposals are carefully reviewed by a scientist, engineer, or educator serving as an NSF Program Officer, and usually by three to ten other persons outside NSF either as ad hoc reviewers, panelists, or both, who are experts in the particular fields represented by the proposal. These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with oversight of the review process. Proposers are invited to hint names of persons they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal and/or persons they would prefer not review the proposal. These suggestions may serve as one source in the reviewer selection process at the Program Officer's discretion. Submission of such names, however, is optional. care is taken to ensure that reviewers believe no conflicts of interest with the proposal. In addition, Program Officers may obtain comments from site visits before recommending final action on proposals. Senior NSF staff further review recommendations for awards. A flowchart that depicts the entire NSF proposal and award process (and associated timeline) is included in PAPPG Exhibit III-1.

    A comprehensive description of the Foundation's merit review process is available on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/.

    Proposers should moreover exist alert of core strategies that are essential to the fulfillment of NSF's mission, as articulated in structure the Future: Investing in Discovery and Innovation - NSF Strategic end for Fiscal Years (FY) 2018 – 2022. These strategies are integrated in the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal review is one part. NSF's mission is particularly well-implemented through the integration of research and education and broadening participation in NSF programs, projects, and activities.

    One of the strategic objectives in uphold of NSF's mission is to foster integration of research and education through the programs, projects, and activities it supports at academic and research institutions. These institutions must recruit, train, and prepare a diverse emanate workforce to promote the frontiers of science and participate in the U.S. technology-based economy. NSF's contribution to the national innovation ecosystem is to provide cutting-edge research under the guidance of the Nation's most creative scientists and engineers. NSF moreover supports evolution of a tenacious science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce by investing in structure the knowledge that informs improvements in emanate teaching and learning.

    NSF's mission calls for the broadening of opportunities and expanding participation of groups, institutions, and geographic regions that are underrepresented in emanate disciplines, which is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports.

    A. Merit Review Principles and Criteria

    The National Science Foundation strives to invest in a robust and diverse portfolio of projects that creates original knowledge and enables breakthroughs in understanding across All areas of science and engineering research and education. To identify which projects to support, NSF relies on a merit review process that incorporates consideration of both the technical aspects of a proposed project and its potential to contribute more broadly to advancing NSF's mission "to promote the progress of science; to promote the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense; and for other purposes." NSF makes every pains to conduct a fair, competitive, transparent merit review process for the selection of projects.

    1. Merit Review Principles

    These principles are to exist given due diligence by PIs and organizations when preparing proposals and managing projects, by reviewers when reading and evaluating proposals, and by NSF program staff when determining whether or not to recommend proposals for funding and while overseeing awards. Given that NSF is the primary federal agency charged with nurturing and supporting excellence in basic research and education, the following three principles apply:

  • All NSF projects should exist of the highest attribute and believe the potential to advance, if not transform, the frontiers of knowledge.
  • NSF projects, in the aggregate, should contribute more broadly to achieving societal goals. These "Broader Impacts" may exist accomplished through the research itself, through activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complementary to, the project. The project activities may exist based on previously established and/or innovative methods and approaches, but in either case must exist well justified.
  • Meaningful assessment and evaluation of NSF funded projects should exist based on usurp metrics, keeping in irony the likely correlation between the sequel of broader impacts and the resources provided to implement projects. If the size of the activity is limited, evaluation of that activity in isolation is not likely to exist meaningful. Thus, assessing the effectiveness of these activities may best exist done at a higher, more aggregated, smooth than the individual project.
  • With respect to the third principle, even if assessment of Broader Impacts outcomes for particular projects is done at an aggregated level, PIs are expected to exist accountable for carrying out the activities described in the funded project. Thus, individual projects should involve clearly stated goals, specific descriptions of the activities that the PI intends to do, and a end in station to document the outputs of those activities.

    These three merit review principles provide the basis for the merit review criteria, as well as a context within which the users of the criteria can better understand their intent.

    2. Merit Review Criteria

    All NSF proposals are evaluated through disburse of the two National Science Board approved merit review criteria. In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and activities.

    The two merit review criteria are listed below. Both criteria are to exist given replete consideration during the review and decision-making processes; each criterion is necessary but neither, by itself, is sufficient. Therefore, proposers must fully address both criteria. (PAPPG Chapter II.C.2.d(i). contains additional information for disburse by proposers in evolution of the Project Description section of the proposal). Reviewers are strongly encouraged to review the criteria, including PAPPG Chapter II.C.2.d(i), prior to the review of a proposal.

    When evaluating NSF proposals, reviewers will exist asked to account what the proposers want to do, why they want to achieve it, how they end to achieve it, how they will know if they succeed, and what benefits could accrue if the project is successful. These issues apply both to the technical aspects of the proposal and the passage in which the project may produce broader contributions. To that end, reviewers will exist asked to evaluate All proposals against two criteria:

  • Intellectual Merit: The Intellectual Merit criterion encompasses the potential to promote knowledge; and
  • Broader Impacts: The Broader Impacts criterion encompasses the potential to profit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal outcomes.
  • The following elements should exist considered in the review for both criteria:

  • What is the potential for the proposed activity to
  • Advance knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields (Intellectual Merit); and
  • Benefit society or promote desired societal outcomes (Broader Impacts)?
  • To what extent achieve the proposed activities hint and explore creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts?
  • Is the end for carrying out the proposed activities well-reasoned, well-organized, and based on a sound rationale? Does the end incorporate a mechanism to assess success?
  • How well qualified is the individual, team, or organization to conduct the proposed activities?
  • Are there adequate resources available to the PI (either at the home organization or through collaborations) to carry out the proposed activities?
  • Broader impacts may exist accomplished through the research itself, through the activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complementary to, the project. NSF values the advancement of scientific knowledge and activities that contribute to achievement of societally material outcomes. Such outcomes include, but are not limited to: replete participation of women, persons with disabilities, and underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM); improved emanate education and educator evolution at any level; increased public scientific literacy and public tryst with science and technology; improved well-being of individuals in society; evolution of a diverse, globally competitive emanate workforce; increased partnerships between academia, industry, and others; improved national security; increased economic competitiveness of the United States; and enhanced infrastructure for research and education.

    Proposers are reminded that reviewers will moreover exist asked to review the Data Management end and the Postdoctoral Researcher Mentoring Plan, as appropriate.

    Additional Solicitation Specific Review Criteria

    For All proposals, reviewers will exist asked to consider:

  • How well does the proposed labor address and promote the following?
  • Secure-by-design systems;
  • Manageability of the system under consideration; and/or
  • Fundamental understanding of the system or system component.
  • How well does the proposal characterize an evaluation end that assesses and where usurp quantifies the expected research outcomes?
  • How well does the proposal characterize research dissemination plans to ensure that the research results can exist validated independently?
  • For large and material Medium proposals, reviewers will exist asked to:

  • Comment on the extent to which the project scope justifies the smooth of investment requested, and the degree to which the Collaboration end (if required) adequately demonstrates that the participating investigators will labor synergistically to accomplish the project objectives.
  • Comment on whether key personnel, and especially lead PIs, believe allocated adequate time for both their individual technical contributions and the leadership of collaborative activities necessary to realize the synergistic effects of larger-scale research.
  • B. Review and Selection Process

    Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation will exist reviewed by Ad hoc Review and/or Panel Review.

    Reviewers will exist asked to evaluate proposals using two National Science Board approved merit review criteria and, if applicable, additional program specific criteria. A summary rating and accompanying narrative will generally exist completed and submitted by each reviewer and/or panel. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will account the recommendation of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation.

    After scientific, technical and programmatic review and consideration of usurp factors, the NSF Program Officer recommends to the cognizant Division Director whether the proposal should exist declined or recommended for award. NSF strives to exist able to expound applicants whether their proposals believe been declined or recommended for funding within six months. large or particularly tangled proposals or proposals from original awardees may require additional review and processing time. The time interval begins on the deadline or target date, or receipt date, whichever is later. The interval ends when the Division Director acts upon the Program Officer's recommendation.

    After programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will exist forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements for review of business, financial, and policy implications. After an administrative review has occurred, Grants and Agreements Officers perform the processing and issuance of a concede or other agreement. Proposers are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer may produce commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or license the expenditure of funds. No commitment on the Part of NSF should exist inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization that makes pecuniary or personnel commitments in the absence of a concede or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so at their own risk.

    Once an award or declination decision has been made, Principal Investigators are provided feedback about their proposals. In All cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents. Verbatim copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers or any reviewer-identifying information, are sent to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Officer. In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award or decline funding.

    VII. AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION A. Notification of the Award

    Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by a Grants Officer in the Division of Grants and Agreements. Organizations whose proposals are declined will exist advised as promptly as practicable by the cognizant NSF Program administering the program. Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will exist provided automatically to the Principal Investigator. (See Section VI.B. for additional information on the review process).

    B. Award Conditions

    An NSF award consists of: (1) the award notice, which includes any special provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which NSF has based its uphold (or otherwise communicates any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in the award notice; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as concede general Conditions (GC-1)*; or Research Terms and Conditions* and (5) any announcement or other NSF issuance that may exist incorporated by reference in the award notice. Cooperative agreements moreover are administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement pecuniary and Administrative Terms and Conditions (CA-FATC) and the applicable Programmatic Terms and Conditions. NSF awards are electronically signed by an NSF Grants and Agreements Officer and transmitted electronically to the organization via e-mail.

    *These documents may exist accessed electronically on NSF's Website at https://www.nsf.gov/awards/managing/award_conditions.jsp?org=NSF. Paper copies may exist obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from nsfpubs@nsf.gov.

    More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions and other well-known information on the administration of NSF awards is contained in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures lead (PAPPG) Chapter VII, available electronically on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.

    C. Reporting Requirements

    For All multi-year grants (including both gauge and continuing grants), the Principal Investigator must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer no later than 90 days prior to the remain of the current budget period. (Some programs or awards require submission of more frequent project reports). No later than 120 days following expiration of a grant, the PI moreover is required to submit a final project report, and a project outcomes report for the general public.

    Failure to provide the required annual or final project reports, or the project outcomes report, will delay NSF review and processing of any future funding increments as well as any pending proposals for All identified PIs and co-PIs on a given award. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in promote to assure availability of required data.

    PIs are required to disburse NSF's electronic project-reporting system, available through Research.gov, for preparation and submission of annual and final project reports. Such reports provide information on accomplishments, project participants (individual and organizational), publications, and other specific products and impacts of the project. Submission of the report via Research.gov constitutes certification by the PI that the contents of the report are accurate and complete. The project outcomes report moreover must exist prepared and submitted using Research.gov. This report serves as a brief summary, prepared specifically for the public, of the nature and outcomes of the project. This report will exist posted on the NSF website exactly as it is submitted by the PI.

    More comprehensive information on NSF Reporting Requirements and other well-known information on the administration of NSF awards is contained in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures lead (PAPPG) Chapter VII, available electronically on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.

    VIII. AGENCY CONTACTS

    Please note that the program contact information is current at the time of publishing. see program website for any updates to the points of contact.

    General inquiries regarding this program should exist made to:

    For questions related to the disburse of FastLane, contact:

    For questions relating to Grants.gov contact:

  • Grants.gov Contact Center: If the Authorized Organizational Representatives (AOR) has not received a confirmation message from Grants.gov within 48 hours of submission of application, gratify contact via telephone: 1-800-518-4726; e-mail: support@grants.gov.

  • IX. OTHER INFORMATION

    The NSF website provides the most comprehensive source of information on NSF Directorates (including contact information), programs and funding opportunities. disburse of this website by potential proposers is strongly encouraged. In addition, "NSF Update" is an information-delivery system designed to preserve potential proposers and other interested parties apprised of original NSF funding opportunities and publications, well-known changes in proposal and award policies and procedures, and upcoming NSF Grants Conferences. Subscribers are informed through e-mail or the user's Web browser each time original publications are issued that match their identified interests. "NSF Update" moreover is available on NSF's website.

    Grants.gov provides an additional electronic capability to search for Federal government-wide concede opportunities. NSF funding opportunities may exist accessed via this mechanism. Further information on Grants.gov may exist obtained at http://www.grants.gov.

    ABOUT THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

    The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent Federal agency created by the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended (42 USC 1861-75). The Act states the purpose of the NSF is "to promote the progress of science; [and] to promote the national health, prosperity, and welfare by supporting research and education in All fields of science and engineering."

    NSF funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. It does this through grants and cooperative agreements to more than 2,000 colleges, universities, K-12 school systems, businesses, informal science organizations and other research organizations throughout the US. The Foundation accounts for about one-fourth of Federal uphold to academic institutions for basic research.

    NSF receives approximately 55,000 proposals each year for research, education and training projects, of which approximately 11,000 are funded. In addition, the Foundation receives several thousand applications for graduate and postdoctoral fellowships. The agency operates no laboratories itself but does uphold National Research Centers, user facilities, certain oceanographic vessels and Arctic and Antarctic research stations. The Foundation moreover supports cooperative research between universities and industry, US participation in international scientific and engineering efforts, and educational activities at every academic level.

    Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) provide funding for special assistance or rig to enable persons with disabilities to labor on NSF-supported projects. see the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures lead Chapter II.E.6 for instructions regarding preparation of these types of proposals.

    The National Science Foundation has Telephonic Device for the Deaf (TDD) and Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) capabilities that enable individuals with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation about NSF programs, employment or general information. TDD may exist accessed at (703) 292-5090 and (800) 281-8749, FIRS at (800) 877-8339.

    The National Science Foundation Information hub may exist reached at (703) 292-5111.

    The National Science Foundation promotes and advances scientific progress in the United States by competitively awarding grants and cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering.

    To accept the latest information about program deadlines, to download copies of NSF publications, and to access abstracts of awards, visit the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov

    2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314

  • For general Information (NSF Information Center):
  • (703) 292-5111

  • TDD (for the hearing-impaired):
  • (703) 292-5090

  • To Order Publications or Forms:
  • Send an e-mail to:

    nsfpubs@nsf.gov

    or telephone:

    (703) 292-7827

    (703) 292-5111

    PRIVACY ACT AND PUBLIC affliction STATEMENTS

    The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will exist used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; and project reports submitted by awardees will exist used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive offshoot and to Congress. The information requested may exist disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as Part of the proposal review process; to proposer institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies or other entities needing information regarding applicants or nominees as Part of a joint application review process, or in order to coordinate programs or policy; and to another Federal agency, court, or party in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may exist added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. see Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," 69 Federal Register 26410 (May 12, 2004), and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records," 69 Federal Register 26410 (May 12, 2004). Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to provide replete and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award.

    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a convincing Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The OMB control number for this collection is 3145-0058. Public reporting affliction for this collection of information is estimated to medium 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. send comments regarding the affliction rate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

    Suzanne H. PlimptonReports Clearance OfficerOffice of the general CounselNational Science FoundationAlexandria, VA 22314


    Debunking the Missile-Defense Myth | killexams.com true questions and Pass4sure dumps

    A report by the Pentagon's own Defense Science Board (DSB) has poured composed water on U.S. missile-defense plans. It basically backs up what independent scientists and engineers believe been motto for  decades: a dedicated adversary easily could beat the planned system by using simple decoy warheads and other countermeasures. So while missile defense will create incentives for U.S. adversaries and competitors to up their ballistic-missile stockpiles, it won't provide any combat capability to counteract these enlarged arsenals.

    The simplest countermeasures to the planned missile defense are cheap inflatable balloons. Because the missile-defense interceptors try to strike ICBM warheads in the vacuum of space, any such balloons and the warhead would travel together, making it impossible to expound the decoys from the true thing . An enemy bent on delivering a nuclear payload to the United States could inflate many such balloons nearby the warhead and overwhelm the defense system by swamping it with fake signals.

    The DSB report says that “the import of achieving liable . . . discrimination [between the warhead and decoys] cannot exist overemphasized.” It underlined that missile defense is “predicated on the ability to discriminate” true warheads from other targets, “such as rocket bodies, miscellaneous hardware, and intentional countermeasures.” One passage around this challenge is to attempt to intercept the missile before it releases the warhead and decoys. But intercepting missiles in their boost phase, while the rocket booster is noiseless firing, is “currently not feasible,” according to the DSB.

    There is a short interval between the time the missile stops burning and when the payload is released, assumed to exist about one hundred seconds by the DSB. But, again, intercepting the missile in this window “requires Herculean pains and is not realistically achievable, even under the most optimistic set of deployment, sensor capability, and missile technology assumptions.” The main problem the DSB create is that missile-defense interceptors would not exist able to gain the target quickly enough: “in most cases 100 seconds is too late” to prevent the release of decoys. And if “the defense should find itself in a situation where it is shooting at missile junk or decoys, the impact on the regional interceptor inventory would exist stagy and devastating.” In short, the interceptor inventory would exist exhausted in chasing decoy warheads.

    The latest tests of both the ground-based and sea-based missile-defense systems believe failed—and these are rigged tests, where the intercept team knows the timing and trajectory of the incoming missile, and the missile has no decoys. There are no such luxuries in the true world, where adversaries launch astonish attacks and disburse countermeasures and decoys. And on the very few occasions that the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) has tested countermeasures, even these carefully rigged tests believe never succeeded. The sea-based missile-defense system moreover has never been tested in really uneven sea conditions and is known to exist unreliable .

    How did such an untested and unworkable technology produce it so far in the DoD procurement process? Another recent government report, this one from the GAO, explains that instead of flying before buying, the MDA has been doing the exact opposite. Its cart-before-the-horse methodology has resulted in “unexpected cost increases, schedule delays, test problems, and performance shortfalls.”

    All told, the missile-defense program has cost more than the entire Apollo program without providing any credible combat capability against enemy ballistic missiles hosting simple countermeasures.

    The Reaction

    If missile defense is so dysfunctional and so simple to outfox, why achieve U.S. adversaries loom to exist so concerned? The reply is simple: their military planners are hypercautious—as are the ones in the Pentagon—and must assume a worst-case scenario in which the system is highly effective.

    Missile defense will therefore strengthen the hands of overcautious, misinformed, opportunistic or hawkish elements within the Iranian and North Korean—as well as Russian and Chinese—political and military establishments. Both unknowable future circumstances and pressures from hawkish internal constituencies will pressure All these regimes to increase deployed nuclear stockpiles and military expenditures.

    Since the interplay between strategic defense and strategic offense is explicitly recognized in the original Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) between the United States and Russia, it is highly improbable that Russia will ever accept NATO missile defense, even if it's dysfunctional. Any system that raises uncertainties about the strict balance of arms agreed upon in original START is a natural concern to both parties.

    The United States and NATO believe repeatedly stated that the system is not directed at Russia and poses no threat to its nuclear-deterrent forces. And though NATO has invited the Russians to link the program, there has been no consensus on the degree or the contour of that participation. Moscow prefers to develop a joint European missile-defense network with NATO to ensure that the elements of the system (in a number of European countries) will not threaten Russia’s national security. NATO, in contrast, proposes the creation of two entirely divide systems that would exchange information. To date, missile-defense talks between Russia and NATO are deadlocked over this contentious issue.



    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [47 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [746 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1530 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [368 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [269 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]





    References :


    Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12846751
    Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12942109
    Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2018/01/dont-miss-these-scp-sc0-402-dumps.html
    Wordpress : https://wp.me/p7SJ6L-2K8
    Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/b27kh8lmhs2072vbfzj98n0hk87eeaf7











    Killexams SC0-402 exams | Killexams SC0-402 cert | Pass4Sure SC0-402 questions | Pass4sure SC0-402 | pass-guaratee SC0-402 | best SC0-402 test preparation | best SC0-402 training guides | SC0-402 examcollection | killexams | killexams SC0-402 review | killexams SC0-402 legit | kill SC0-402 example | kill SC0-402 example journalism | kill exams SC0-402 reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review SC0-402 | review SC0-402 quizlet | review SC0-402 login | review SC0-402 archives | review SC0-402 sheet | legitimate SC0-402 | legit SC0-402 | legitimacy SC0-402 | legitimation SC0-402 | legit SC0-402 check | legitimate SC0-402 program | legitimize SC0-402 | legitimate SC0-402 business | legitimate SC0-402 definition | legit SC0-402 site | legit online banking | legit SC0-402 website | legitimacy SC0-402 definition | >pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | SC0-402 material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure SC0-402 exams | pass4sure SC0-402 reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure SC0-402 security | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure SC0-402 dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure SC0-402 braindumps | pass4sure SC0-402 test | pass4sure SC0-402 torrent | pass4sure SC0-402 download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice |



    International Edition Textbooks

    Save huge amounts of cash when you buy international edition textbooks from TEXTBOOKw.com. An international edition is a textbook that has been published outside of the US and can be drastically cheaper than the US edition.

    ** International edition textbooks save students an average of 50% over the prices offered at their college bookstores.

    Highlights > Recent Additions
    Showing Page 1 of 5
    Operations & Process Management: Principles & Practice for Strategic ImpactOperations & Process Management: Principles & Practice for Strategic Impact
    By Nigel Slack, Alistair Jones
    Publisher : Pearson (Feb 2018)
    ISBN10 : 129217613X
    ISBN13 : 9781292176130
    Our ISBN10 : 129217613X
    Our ISBN13 : 9781292176130
    Subject : Business & Economics
    Price : $75.00
    Computer Security: Principles and PracticeComputer Security: Principles and Practice
    By William Stallings, Lawrie Brown
    Publisher : Pearson (Aug 2017)
    ISBN10 : 0134794109
    ISBN13 : 9780134794105
    Our ISBN10 : 1292220619
    Our ISBN13 : 9781292220611
    Subject : Computer Science & Technology
    Price : $65.00
    Urban EconomicsUrban Economics
    By Arthur O’Sullivan
    Publisher : McGraw-Hill (Jan 2018)
    ISBN10 : 126046542X
    ISBN13 : 9781260465426
    Our ISBN10 : 1260084493
    Our ISBN13 : 9781260084498
    Subject : Business & Economics
    Price : $66.00
    Urban EconomicsUrban Economics
    By Arthur O’Sullivan
    Publisher : McGraw-Hill (Jan 2018)
    ISBN10 : 0078021782
    ISBN13 : 9780078021787
    Our ISBN10 : 1260084493
    Our ISBN13 : 9781260084498
    Subject : Business & Economics
    Price : $65.00
    Understanding BusinessUnderstanding Business
    By William G Nickels, James McHugh, Susan McHugh
    Publisher : McGraw-Hill (Feb 2018)
    ISBN10 : 126021110X
    ISBN13 : 9781260211108
    Our ISBN10 : 126009233X
    Our ISBN13 : 9781260092332
    Subject : Business & Economics
    Price : $75.00
    Understanding BusinessUnderstanding Business
    By William Nickels, James McHugh, Susan McHugh
    Publisher : McGraw-Hill (May 2018)
    ISBN10 : 1260682137
    ISBN13 : 9781260682137
    Our ISBN10 : 126009233X
    Our ISBN13 : 9781260092332
    Subject : Business & Economics
    Price : $80.00
    Understanding BusinessUnderstanding Business
    By William Nickels, James McHugh, Susan McHugh
    Publisher : McGraw-Hill (Jan 2018)
    ISBN10 : 1260277143
    ISBN13 : 9781260277142
    Our ISBN10 : 126009233X
    Our ISBN13 : 9781260092332
    Subject : Business & Economics
    Price : $77.00
    Understanding BusinessUnderstanding Business
    By William Nickels, James McHugh, Susan McHugh
    Publisher : McGraw-Hill (Jan 2018)
    ISBN10 : 1259929434
    ISBN13 : 9781259929434
    Our ISBN10 : 126009233X
    Our ISBN13 : 9781260092332
    Subject : Business & Economics
    Price : $76.00
    Business Communication: Developing Leaders for a Networked WorldBusiness Communication: Developing Leaders for a Networked World
    By Peter W. Cardon
    Publisher : McGraw-Hill (Jan 2017)
    ISBN10 : 1260128474
    ISBN13 : 9781260128475
    Our ISBN10 : 1259921883
    Our ISBN13 : 9781259921889
    Subject : Business & Economics, Communication & Media
    Price : $66.00
    Business Communication: Developing Leaders for a Networked WorldBusiness Communication: Developing Leaders for a Networked World
    By Peter Cardon
    Publisher : McGraw-Hill (Feb 2017)
    ISBN10 : 1260147150
    ISBN13 : 9781260147155
    Our ISBN10 : 1259921883
    Our ISBN13 : 9781259921889
    Subject : Business & Economics, Communication & Media
    Price : $64.00
    Result Page : 1 2 3 4 5