what number of questions are requested in 117-301 exam?
killexams.com is a notable web page for 117-301 certification dump. When I found you on the internet, I almost joyed in pleasure because it become exactly what I turned into seeking out. I become searching out a few true and much less steeply-priced assist on line due to the fact I didnt contain the time to fade through bunch of books. I discovered adequate commemorate question birthright here that proved to be very useful. I changed into capable of score rightly in my LPI test and Im obliged.
determined an accurate supply for true 117-301 Questions.
these days i purchased your certification package deal and studied it thoroughly. ultimate week I handed the 117-301 and obtained my certification. killexams.com exam simulator was a bizarre device to prepare the exam. that superior my self assurance and i easily passed the certification exam! enormously endorsed!!! As I had only one week left for exam 117-301, I frantically searched for some specific contents and stopped at killexams.com . It turned into shaped with short query-solutions that had been facile to understand. inside one week, I examine as many questions as viable. within the exam, it changed into smooth for me to control 83% making 50/60 reform solutions in due time. killexams.com become a terrific solution for me. thanks.
it's far unbelieveable, but 117-301 actual exam questions are availabe birthright here.
I became a 117-301 certified closing week. This profession direction is very thrilling, so in case you are nonetheless considering it, manufacture certain you Get questions solutions to prepare the 117-301 exam. this is a massive time saver as you Get precisely what you want to know for the 117-301 exam. that is why I chose it, and i never looked returned.
What contain a watch at manual attain I requisite to bypass 117-301 exam?
With using excellent merchandise of killexams.com, I had scored 90 two percentage marks in 117-301 certification. I waslooking for dependable examine dump to boom my information degree. Technical requirements and difficult language of my certification modified into hard to grasp therefore i was searching for dependable and facile testproducts. I had near to recognise this net site for the coaching of expert certification. It was no longer an smooth mission butonly killexams.com has made this undertaking facile for me. I am feeling terrific for my success and this platform is majestic for me.
Can I find phone number of 117-301 Certified?
i was approximately to give up exam 117-301 because I wasnt confident in whether or not i would pass or not. With just a week ultimate I decided to exchange to killexams.com for my exam education. in no course concept that the subjects that I had constantly elope away from might be so much fun to test; its smooth and quick manner of getting to the factors made my coaching lot less difficult. complete course to killexams.com , I by no means concept i would skip my exam but I did pass with flying colors.
those 117-301 questions and solutions works inside the actual check.
To Get prepared for 117-301 practice exam requires a lot of hard drudgery and time. Time management is such a complicated issue, that can be hardly resolved. But killexams.com certification has really resolved this issue from its root level, by offering number of time schedules, so that one can easily complete his syllabus for 117-301 practice exam. killexams.com certification provides complete the tutorial guides that are necessary for 117-301 practice exam. So I must snarl without wasting your time, start your preparation under killexams.com certifications to Get a lofty score in 117-301 practice exam, and manufacture yourself feel at the top of this world of knowledge.
Do you requisite true test questions of 117-301 examination to prepare?
I passed 117-301 certification with 91 percent marks. Your thoughts dumps are very much dote actual exam. Thank you for your superb help. I am able to preserve to exhaust your dumps for my subsequent certifications. When i used to be hopeless that i cant near to be an IT licensed; my friend informed me approximately you; I attempted your on line education tools for my 117-301 exam and was capable of Get a ninety one result in exam. I very own thanks to killexams.
where can i find lax 117-301 exam questions?
Hey gentlemen I passed my 117-301 exam utilizing killexams.com brain dump study lead in only 20 days of preparation. The dumps completely changed my life after I dispensing them. Presently I am worked in a decent organization with a decent salary. Thanks to killexams.com and the entire team of the trutrainers. Troublesome themes are effectively secured by them. Likewise they give majestic reference which is useful for the study reason. I solved almost complete questions in just 225 minutes.
it is simply brilliant champion to contain 117-301 state-of-the-art dumps.
I passed the 117-301 exam. It changed into the primary time I used killexams.com for my practise, so I didnt recognise what to anticipate. So, I were given a nice miracle as killexams.com has greatly surprised me and absolutely handed my expectations. The exam simulator/practice test drudgery top notch, and the questions are valid. by means of telling I imply that theyre actual exam questions, and that i got many of them on my actual exam. Very dependable, and i used to beleft with notable impressions. i might not waver to propound killexams.com to my colleagues.
Found an accurate source for true 117-301 Questions.
I cleared complete the 117-301 tests effortlessly. This website proved very advantageous in clearing the tests as well as expertise the ideas. complete questions are explanined very well.
in this article they are able to occupy a more in-depth watch at one of the most critical shale basins in the united states (U.S.) mainly focusing on the challenge of well productiveness over time. here's a crucial difficulty since it has ramifications for fairness valuations in the sector (NYSE:XOP) as smartly because the outlook for international oil deliver dynamics.
It occasionally looks that the U.S. shale business just can't loom to shift the narrative and overcome the reputedly overwhelming indigent sentiment overhanging the sphere. but are traders extrapolating one of the most very precise negative risk factors that could be pertinent when it comes to selected companies onto the entire trade?
one of the vital enduring terrible elements it's regularly trumpeted out with the aid of the bears is that these businesses don't look to be producing free cash stream (or not in a position to) as capital bills deserve to continue to be lofty with a purpose to offset legacy declines. It is birthright that legacy decline rates for shale wells are steep. youngsters, many groups (no longer all) were working a tons larger cost of capital expenditure in order to develop production (and in some situations cover prefatory construction expenses linked to infrastructure) and if their smooth become to in simple terms retain flat output ranges, their capital costs could be an dreadful lot lessen.
If they occupy a glance on the most simultaneous consequences presentation from Pioneer herbal elements (NYSE:PXD) they can discern that the company has outlined a capital expenditure budget of around USD three.1bn which well-nigh matches forecasted working money circulation of USD 3.2bn. however, this stage of capital expenditure will outcome in an additional 15% creation boom in oil volumes this yr at a budgeted West Texas Intermediate (WTI) fee of $53 per barrel. If the company were with ease to maintain output at 2018 ranges, the mandatory degree of capital expenditure would decline to $2.2bn, implying EBIT (or salary earlier than tax and hobby) of round $1bn.
Some market individuals may additionally noiseless admiration a bit of unsatisfied at these kindhearted of metrics, however an oil company able to grow construction inside cash current at $fifty three per barrel is surely now not terminally mistaken. specifically when it has a reserve groundwork a helpful course to permit it to provide at current tiers for essentially two decades if not extra. Assuming the identical shape of charge, creation (hence no production increase) and productiveness metrics, PXD could well generate annual EBIT of roughly $2.2bn at a protracted-time age WTI expense of $70.
moving on from this selected narrative, the latest baleful soundbite that investors contain had to suffer is that this simultaneous article posted by using the Wall road Journal.
The article purportedly uncovers a plague structural difficulty in the business in that the productivity and ultimate volumes exhibited by using the industry taking complete wells drilled over the critical length contain fallen in requisite of the quite a lot of ‘classification curves’ presented by the numerous listed groups of their displays. This should noiseless no longer always near as a surprise. Any pro investor may noiseless know that organizations often are trying to depict the very best reflection of their business’ s fundamentals in a presentation. during this sense, are U.S. shale groups any different to most different businesses that automatically miss forecasts or projections that they manufacture in their shows?
Any investor that might cost a corporation primarily based solely on these introduced class curves devoid of applying a suit margin of safety is being silly. in fact it almost always can pay to supervene a margin of safeguard when formulating a valuation considering the fact that it is unimaginable to grasp every thing about a corporation, in any trade really.
but does the Wall road Journal article attest that ordinary trade productivity is declining? we've written in prior articles that there does loom to be a reputable thesis (such as the father or mother-child well interference difficulty) that the productivity positive aspects the industry has registered over the past decade aren't likely to prove sustainable for tons longer.
besides the fact that children, there is not any actual proof at this juncture of a decline in productivity as they are able to discern within the charts beneath taken from the energy suggestions Administration (EIA) newest drilling productiveness file (DPR) for January 2019. productiveness measured in terms oil creation per rig in the first month that a neatly is drilled rose to a record stage in the Bakken basin in 2018 and is noiseless at or proximate to these stages.
supply: EIA, Drilling productiveness report
within the Permian, smartly productivity measured on this groundwork reached a record in early 2016 and however receding partially since then, productivity remains mostly unchanged over the ultimate two years.
supply: EIA, Drilling productivity document
in addition, when it involves the Permian it's crucial to sojourn cognizant that a huge component (1mn bpd) of oil construction factored into the DPR metrics is legacy widely wide-spread production, whereas logistical bottlenecks has meant that the number of drilled but uncompleted wells has climbed enormously over the ultimate twelve months, likely a exiguous distorting these very productiveness metrics.
in view that this manner of measuring productiveness will furthermore be a exiguous bit improper, they checked out different most likely greater valuable comparisons, due to the incredible information compiled and published by Shaleprofile.com. They looked at data for the Bakken and Permian basin specially evaluating the oil creation per well achieved after 365 days for the 2017 antique to the 2016 vintage. For the Bakken the 2016 ancient of wells drilled (737 in total) produced 111,009 barrels per day (bpd) or a hundred and fifty bpd per neatly after one year. The 2017 vintage (992 wells drilled) produced roughly one hundred eighty,000 bpd (we contain extrapolated this from the actual November 2018 determine of 193,000 bpd) or 181 bpd per smartly. they can discern that the 2017 wells are really producing greater oil per smartly twelve months later when in comparison to the 2016 old.
more primarily, Shaleprofile.com actually offers a evaluation between calendar vintages when it comes to oil construction per smartly for each and every yr, depicted below. they can discern that for the Bakken basin as a minimum, productiveness as measured in oil produced per neatly accomplished has stronger each year.
analyzing the very information for the Permian basin, the equal style is largely observed. The 2017 ancient of wells drilled are producing extra oil per well drilled three hundred and sixty five days later (December 2018) when in comparison to the 2016 vintage of wells. again referencing the records from Shaleprofile.com for the Permian below they can discern within the second chart that the cumulative construction per well for the 2018 and 2017 vintages are operating forward of prior year vintages.
What happens if productiveness ranges decline going forward?
First, what can they conclude from the above analysis? in complete probability, most importantly the suggestion that shale productiveness is declining or has vastly “undershot” prior expectations is it appears that evidently mistaken. truly, if the repose the business has up to now over delivered in terms of productivity positive factors, which in eddy is why they dependence that these helpful points are likely going to present unsustainable going ahead. however, notwithstanding productivity tiers flatten out or decline slightly from current stages, here is now not a bearish component for many of the individual organizations themselves.
As we've mentioned in a previous article, a ten% decline in productivity would “Ceteris Paribus” raise total construction (including capital) expenses with the aid of 10% or assuming a groundwork suffuse of $30 per barrel of oil such as $33. besides the fact that children, a 10% (and even simply flat) decline in productiveness would contain large implications for overall U.S. oil creation boom and therefore the global oil market, considering the fact that the international oil market at the minute well-nigh relies just about entirely on an augment in U.S. creation boom to fill the incremental augment in world oil demand.
excessive legacy decline fees imply that shale oil operators attain should drill a larger number of wells every year with a purpose to boost output tiers. (word: boost now not retain - here's a vital ample incompatibility and has nothing to attain with individual smartly productivity). this suggests a concomitant boost within the rig import number, each year. Referencing statistics compiled and presented by using Raymond James beneath, they can discern that totally to ensure that U.S. production degrees to hold transforming into, the rig import number will should augment by using roughly 30% over the subsequent two years. This forecast assumes a 5% enhance in productivity into perpetuity.
If productivity degrees stall or decline modestly (possible in their opinion) then the necessary enhance within the rig import number will should be even larger, most likely 40% to 50% bigger. Such a ample boost within the rig import number will effortlessly now not ensue with oil prices beneath $60 per barrel and quite perhaps it could possibly require sustained fees above $70 per barrel. Assuming a 5% to 10% decline in productiveness degrees ends up in an equilibrium fee of between $70 to $90 per barrel imperative to stimulate renewed rig deployment (in the trade as an entire), the incremental augment in revenues that would accrue to many U.S. shale producers would dwarf the marginal augment in charges associated with a one of these decline in productiveness.
With the oil rig import number (as depicted under) having remained largely flat over the ultimate six months, it seems that we're a very helpful course away from reaching the sort of rig import required to ensure continued creation boom within the usaor at least at a stage similar to what we've viewed over the past two years. really, in keeping with probably the most simultaneous EIA DPR record for January 2019, projected oil production growth from the a considerable number of shale basins has already been revised sharply lessen to just sixty two,000 bpd (month-to-month), the lowest monthly DPR projection from the EIA on account that January 2017.
supply: Baker Hughes U.S. Oil Rig import number, Tradingeconomics
The precise subject in U.S. shale birthright now
eventually, they ought to spotlight an extra difficulty which they cerebrate will grow to be being course more crucial than the productiveness subject at a macro stage (despite the fact the two are nevertheless a bit of linked) we've discussed at length in this article. The differentiation between core and non-core acreage within North america’ s shale basins is, they believe, going to develop into an increasingly vital factor, no longer only for the organizations themselves, but when it comes to the complete outlook for world power expenditures.
Returning to the Permian for example and greater above complete the fresh pursuits that contain unfolded at Laredo Petroleum (NYSE:LPI) they can illustrate extra accurately what they try to convey. LPI's acreage within the Midland constituent of the Permian basin is arguably backyard what's now considered the core or gold touchstone acreage in the enviornment. This does not be critical that their acreage is uneconomic at present costs, nonetheless it isn't going to supply the returns that operators are becoming within the core area.
For functions of their example they will exhaust records from a presentation given via Parsley energy (NYSE:PE) through which they current their personal estimation of the the station the core acreage within the Midland component of the Permian lies.
supply: corporate Presentation, Parsley energy
we are able to discern that much (although not all) of the acreage is concentrated within the Midland, Martin and Upton counties. In distinction, LPI's acreage (or at the least in accordance with Parsley's estimation) lies backyard the core enviornment as defined within the Reagan and Glasscock counties.
supply: corporate Presentation, Laredo Petroleum
to ensure that us to verify Parsley energy's estimation of what constitutes core acreage within the Midland basin they again to Shaleprofile.com and looked at the historical productivity of wells drilled in the a variety of counties pertinent to the Midland basin area. above complete they looked at cumulative oil production 24 months after a neatly has been drilled. If they genesis with Midland county itself (arguably the epicenter of the core), they can discern that common well productivity here indicates no badge of degradation.
by contrast if look at the identical timeline of 24 months for wells drilled in Reagan county they examine here -
This statistics at least seems to verify Parsley's power's definition of what constitutes "core acreage" in this a partake of the Permian. curiously we'd constituent out that typical well productivity in Glasscock county reflects a similar sample to that followed in Midland county even if it is largely described as being outdoor the core. despite the fact, over a 12 month time-body well productivity in Glasscock has furthermore declined and in distinction to Midland county, where touchstone well productivity measured over 12 months continues to be at a listing excessive.
In LPI's case the incontrovertible fact that they look to own acreage outdoor of what may furthermore be considered "core" became compounded by using a option in 2017 to drill larger density wells per spacing unit (a spacing unit is typically 640 acres) or 32 wells per unit from eight to sixteen wells per unit. The result predictably resulted in "dad or mum-baby interference" as more infill wells contain been drilled and resulted in an surprising decline in oil productivity, thus forcing administration to near back to a lessen density drilling programme.
let us be clear although, an operator it truly is experiencing declining productivity because of a drilling programme that has overly dense spacing is facing a different concern from one working out of core acreage or transferring their drilling programme to poorer acreage. the previous situation can be resolved by using the business adopting wider spacing with the intention to recrudesce its productiveness stages lower back to where they had been. Naturally this reduces the number of competencies well places that may furthermore be drilled by the enterprise, but when an organization has a very giant stock or drilling areas (like LPI) then the greatest contain an repercussion on are not that large.
despite the fact, if a company is now having to shift its drilling programme to acreage with reduce intrinsic productiveness or a lessen "oil cut" there's without problems not a helpful deal they can attain about that. during this regard, there are likely to be many smaller or inner most operators that are facing just this kindhearted of status of affairs over the following few years. Naturally, the two concerns could nonetheless be linked in that poorer acreage can't accommodate the identical kind of density that stronger acreage can and during this sense an operator in a non-core enviornment running the very sort of spacing density as operators within the core should noiseless be considered probably bigger risk.
Why are they bringing up this specific illustration? neatly for two causes. the primary purpose is as an example how much smaller the ultimate core acreage in the main shale basins in the U.S. may actually be. really as highlighted during this report from Kimmeridge power, total core acreage in the Midland basin may furthermore best volume to a few 800,000 acres which via their definition comprises acreage in counties similar to Reagan and Glasscock which Parsley power's records shows best comprises a miniature constituent of core acreage.
moreover related to here is the indisputable fact that lots if now not most of this core acreage is now consolidated within the hands of a simply a number of groups. there's the very dynamic at play in the different foremost oil producing basins in the united states, the Bakken and Eagle Ford, which along with the Permian account for ninety% of total taut (shale) oil production in the U.S.
So what, some may ask? well, the value is that youngsters these organizations contain tremendous reserves, they even contain well delineated long-time age progress plans that target a particular expense of annual growth in production, continually between 10% and 20%. they are extraordinarily not likely to deviate, or at the least meaningfully, from these long-time age production plans until fees alternate at a helpful deal larger degrees for a sustained age of time.
As smaller operators or companies with less eye-catching acreage elope out of core acreage, the all boost in construction from these basins will ultimately emanate totally from these handful of ‘ core’ operators, as they can be the most effective ones left with fiscal or core acreage to occupy advantage of and therefore grow production. in the finish this suggests that in the future a tremendously larger and sustained cost may be required to chase the needle on U.S. production growth than has been the case during the past. it will ought to be sufficiently multiplied with a purpose to manufacture inevitable that extra marginal or “Tier 2” acreage is economic. this may or should dramatically boost the charge of organizations that contain tremendous reserves (or many years of core creation) of Tier 1 acreage.
The 2nd intent they are highlighting LPI listed here is to present that on the reform fee even corporations with extra marginal acreage may nevertheless be eye-catching as abilities investments. here's chiefly the case with organizations that noiseless contain a fairly large stock of drilling areas relative to their latest stage of completions and the station the decline in productiveness can furthermore be largely remedied with the aid of adopting wider spacing between wells.
LPI has naturally had its complications and its construction profile is partially gassy (oil only contains 37% of total oil equal production). indeed this seems to be fitting a greater average feature of the Midland basin, namely a reasonably chunky upward thrust within the gas-Oil ratio over time and a residual risk component for operators during this basin together with LPI.
nonetheless, if they anticipate that the suitable "incentive" charge for the U.S. shale business as a all (in order to manufacture inevitable that touchstone production growth continues to be above 1mn bpd) is round $70, then even LPI may additionally present some upside from current tiers. LPI nevertheless retains considerable acreage and even at an assumed lessen spacing interval of snarl 5 to 8 wells per 640 acre spacing unit would contain some 1,000 to 1,600 ultimate neatly places as inventory.
At a construction pace of round 50-60 completions per yr (the surely cadence to manufacture certain a flat creation profile Put up 2020) this may translate into 15 to twenty years charge of inventory. At an extended-term WTI charge of $70, LPI continues to be supine to generate adequate operational cash chase to cowl its required capital fees and generate wholesome extra earnings, regardless of what they might furthermore add is a very hefty accepted and Administrative rate burden! (another excuse why the industry should discern even more consolidation in order to convey legal shareholder cost).
*LPI - the canary in the coalmine?
LPI's acreage however in complete probability now not considered as core continues to be viewed as Tier one and never complete that marginal. despite this truth they will discern from the slither taken from their q4 revenue presentation and according to their latest assumption of $fifty four per barrel going ahead, LPI is cutting back is energetic rig import number from 3 to 1 and cutting back its total capital expenditure funds for 2019 by means of basically 50%. LPI's current and long elope drilling programme will result in a 5% decline in oil production this 12 months and flat construction from 2020 onwards (2 rigs)
source: this Fall earnings presentation, Laredo Petroleum
So from their perspective they may view LPI as a potential barometer for the total industry in that its acreage seems to be in the "core" of the trade range. In a nutshell, if the oil charge increases to a degree where LPI is producing ample money movement and management feels sufficiently assured to delivery ramping up construction, then we've likely reached a similar inflexion aspect for the all business and vice-versa.
certainly, LPI's incentive cost with the intention to ramp up production is now above $60 per barrel (in complete probability $70?). If here is the case they will conclude that except oil expenditures recrudesce to the $70 to $80 stage, fabric draw back risk to U.S. oil production growth forecasts are likely to emerge as the year unfolds.
Disclosure: i am/we're long LPI. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my very own opinions. i am not receiving compensation for it (apart from from in the hunt for Alpha). I don't contain any enterprise relationship with any company whose inventory is outlined in this article.
For the most part, the Wi-Fi Alliance is stoked about the commemorate of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) wherein the FCC is analyzing methods to manufacture up to 1200 megahertz of spectrum accessible to be used by using unlicensed devices in the 6 GHz corps (5.925-7.one hundred twenty five GHz). nevertheless it's offering some concepts for adjustments, announcing its tips will be certain insurance scheme of incumbent operations whereas providing severely essential spectrum for unlicensed makes exhaust of dote Wi-Fi.
The FCC launched the NPRM closing Fall and posed a chain of inquiries to business stakeholders on a number of proposals to manufacture complete of it work. the primary round of feedback became due on Friday.
The Wi-Fi Alliance celebrated it helps the FCC’s strategy to divide the 6 GHz corps into four sub-bands: the U-NII-5 (5.925-6.425 GHz), U-NII-6 (6.425-6.525 GHz), U-NII-7 (6.525-6.875 GHz) and U-NII-8 (6.875-7.a hundred twenty five GHz), according to the features of incumbent features. The alliance additionally supports the commission’s inspiration to modify unlicensed exhaust within the 6 GHz band based on a two-type approach, which differentiates between low-power, indoor-most effective (LPI) AP and standard-vigor AP gadgets.
Attend the 2-Day executive 5G Panel collection
FierceWireless is returning to Barcelona, Spain, throughout cellular World Congress 2019 with a two-day govt 5G Panel sequence at the Fira Congress hotel, with ease found throughout the road from the MWC conference center. The panel activities will occupy region on Feb. 25-26 and should cover 5G and The fastened wireless access possibility, Taking 5G Indoors, and Making 5G Ubiquitous. Attendees will be able to community and listen to from 5G leaders including Verizon, Vodafone, Orange, sprint, NTT Docomo, Boingo wireless, Qualcomm, and extra over the course of two days.
at ease your spot on the suffer today! now is your haphazard to relate fellow business experts for networking and education. Registration assistance and the agenda will furthermore be found on the web page here.
mainly, the alliance needs the FCC to accept as legal with enabling LPI AP operations throughout the entire 6 GHz band, together with the U-NII-5 and U-NII-7 bands, devoid of an automated frequency coordination requirement for these bands. it could additionally want to discern the commission enable client contraptions that duty below the manage of an AP to operate on the identical energy stage because the AP (whether average-energy or LPI), among different things.
linked: Wi-Fi Alliance working on thoughts for 6 GHz
in accordance with the Wi-Fi Alliance, the 6 GHz corps is not simplest advantageous for Wi-Fi, but it surely’s additionally seriously necessary.
“as with every wireless technology, Wi-Fi’s functionality depends on adequate entry to spectrum,” celebrated Alex Roytblat, senior director of regulatory affairs on the Wi-Fi Alliance, in a statement provided to FierceWirelessTech. “at present, Wi-Fi’s performance, capabilities, and its role in the Nation’s telecommunications infrastructure and economy are threatened by means of the want of enough spectrum entry.
related: Wi-Fi Alliance, Cisco among these applauding 6 GHz motion
“To verify this threat, Wi-Fi Alliance commissioned a Spectrum wants analyze that analyzed present and future Wi-Fi spectrum necessities. in response to projected augment prominent for Wi-Fi, through 2025, up to 1500 megahertz of further mid-band spectrum may be vital to preserve the Wi-Fi ecosystem,” he introduced.
Importantly, the 6 GHz corps additionally offers contiguous spectrum blocks to accommodate one hundred sixty megahertz channels, that are required for prime-bandwidth applications, akin to excessive-definition video streaming and digital fact. The subsequent technology of Wi-Fi—which is in keeping with IEEE 802.11ax, often known as Wi-Fi 6—is designed to lead these excessive-facts throughput functions.
“in short, the course forward for Wi-Fi and its capacity to continue to carry a pleasing consumer experience, connectivity, economic cost, and a lot of different advantages depends on entry to the entire 6 GHz band,” Roytblat said.
As Wi-Fi Now pronounced remaining week, the IEEE 802.11 working group has determined that best Wi-Fi 6 instruments should be permitted to operate within the prospective novel 6 GHz Wi-Fi bands, as hostile to past iterations of the ordinary. The determination potential that Wi-Fi 6 could be defined for operation in complete present Wi-Fi bands together with 2.four GHz, 5 GHz and future 6 GHz. Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) will continue to operate in 5 GHz only, while 2.4 GHz will nonetheless lead older Wi-Fi models (predominantly Wi-Fi four or 802.11n), based on Wi-Fi Now.
The Wi-Fi Alliance, despite the fact, celebrated it enthusiastically helps the fee’s inspiration to prolong unlicensed access to the 6 GHz corps but doesn’t are seeking for to restrict unlicensed operations to a particular common or technology.
“old FCC selections to enable unlicensed exhaust on a know-how-impartial basis leveraged a confined quantity of spectrum (e.g., 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz bands) into an explosion of wireless innovation,” Roytblat referred to. “A technology-impartial regulatory model within the 6 GHz corps would proceed to foster this innovation. The 6 GHz corps is uniquely applicable for the Wi-Fi 6 implementation and Wi-Fi industry is constructing this expertise in anticipation of the 6 GHz spectrum becoming obtainable in the proximate future. Wi-Fi Alliance additionally is noiseless focused on their core mission to sustain interoperability so that users contain the best workable Wi-Fi experience.”
Wall street expects a 12 months-over-12 months enhance in income on greater revenues when Laredo Petroleum (LPI) stories results for the quarter ended December 2018. while this commonly-known consensus outlook is crucial in gauging the enterprise's profits picture, a magnificent ingredient that could influence its near-time age stock fee is how the genuine outcomes compare to those estimates.
The stock might movement bigger if these key numbers desirable expectations in the upcoming income document, which is expected to be released on February 13. on the other hand, in the event that they omit, the inventory may circulate lower.
while management's discussion of business circumstances on the salary convoke will commonly investigate the sustainability of the instant rate change and future profits expectations, it be charge having a handicapping insight into the percentages of a benign EPS surprise.
Zacks Consensus Estimate
This oil and natural fuel business is expected to Put up quarterly revenue of $0.20 per partake in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year alternate of +5.three%.
Revenues are expected to be $242.fifty nine million, up 0.9% from the year-in the past quarter.
Estimate Revisions fashion
The consensus EPS assay for the quarter has been revised forty four.forty four% lessen over the ultimate 30 days to the current level. here's well-nigh a reflection of how the overlaying analysts contain together reassessed their prefatory estimates over this period.
buyers should occupy into account that an combination alternate may furthermore no longer at complete times replicate the direction of assay revisions through each of the protecting analysts.
cost, Consensus and EPS shock
Estimate revisions ahead of a corporation's profits release present clues to the enterprise conditions for the age whose consequences are coming out. This perception is at the core of their proprietary shock prediction mannequin -- the Zacks earnings ESP (anticipated shock Prediction).
The Zacks revenue ESP compares essentially the most reform assay to the Zacks Consensus assay for the quarter; probably the most reform assay is a extra recent edition of the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate. The thought here is that analysts revising their estimates birthright before an profits liberate contain the newest assistance, which may probably be extra accurate than what they and others contributing to the consensus had predicted earlier.
thus, a positive or terrible profits ESP analyzing theoretically shows the doubtless divergence of the specific income from the consensus estimate. although, the mannequin's predictive energy is huge for high-quality ESP readings simplest.
a positive income ESP is a sturdy predictor of an profits beat, specially when mixed with a Zacks Rank #1 (potent buy), 2 (purchase) or 3 (dangle). Their analysis suggests that shares with this composite produce a benign dumbfound nearly 70% of the time, and a bizarre Zacks Rank in fact increases the predictive dash of salary ESP.
Please word that a indigent income ESP analyzing isn't indicative of an profits miss. Their research shows that it is difficult to forecast an profits beat with any diploma of self assurance for stocks with indigent revenue ESP readings and/or Zacks Rank of 4 (promote) or 5 (potent promote).
How contain the Numbers shaped Up for Laredo Petroleum?
For Laredo Petroleum, probably the most accurate assay is the very as the Zacks Consensus Estimate, suggesting that there are no fresh analyst views which ambit from what had been regarded to derive the consensus estimate. This has resulted in an income ESP of 0%.
on the other hand, the stock at the minute carries a Zacks Rank of #three.
So, this composite makes it tricky to conclusively forecast that Laredo Petroleum will beat the consensus EPS estimate.
Does earnings dumbfound background hang Any Clue?
Analysts often harmonize with to what extent a corporation has been capable of match consensus estimates in the past while calculating their estimates for its future earnings. So, it be charge taking a watch at the shock background for gauging its repercussion on the upcoming number.
For the closing mentioned quarter, it was anticipated that Laredo Petroleum would Put up revenue of $0.30 per partake when it really produced income of $0.27, supplying a dumbfound of -10%.
Over the ultimate four quarters, the enterprise has crushed consensus EPS estimates only once.
An earnings beat or pass over may now not be the sole basis for a inventory touching bigger or reduce. Many stocks become losing ground regardless of an profits beat as a result of other elements that disappoint traders. in a similar fashion, unforeseen catalysts champion a number of shares profit regardless of an earnings leave out.
That noted, making a bet on shares which are expected to beat salary expectations does augment the odds of success. this is why it's value checking an organization's earnings ESP and Zacks Rank forward of its quarterly liberate. be inevitable to utilize their earnings ESP Filter to find the premiere shares to buy or sell earlier than they've mentioned.
Laredo Petroleum does not look a compelling income-beat candidate. despite the fact, traders should pay attention to different elements too for making a bet on this inventory or staying faraway from it forward of its earnings liberate.
desire the latest concepts from Zacks funding analysis? nowadays, which you could download 7 most advantageous stocks for the subsequent 30 Days. click to Get this free document To examine this text on Zacks.com click on birthright here.
While it is very hard assignment to choose dependable certification questions / answers resources with respect to review, reputation and validity because people Get ripoff due to choosing wrong service. Killexams.com manufacture it certain to serve its clients best to its resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other's ripoff report complaint clients near to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams happily and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and property because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self-possession is critical to us. Specially they occupy keeping of killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If you discern any erroneous report posted by their competitors with the title killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something dote this, just sustain in intelligence that there are always baleful people damaging reputation of helpful services due to their benefits. There are thousands of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams practice questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their sample questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
Precisely very 117-301 questions as in true test, WTF! We contain Tested and Approved 117-301 Exams. killexams.com gives the exact and most recent IT exam materials which practically contain complete information focuses. With the lead of their 117-301 exam materials, you dont contain to squander your chance on perusing reference books and simply requisite to sear through 10-20 hours to ace their 117-301 true questions and answers.
If you are examining out LPI 117-301 Dumps containing true exam Questions and Answers for the LPI 301 Core test prep? killexams.com is reform here to provide you one most updated and glorious database of 117-301 Dumps that's http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/117-301. they contain got aggregative information of 117-301 Dumps questions from true tests to provide you an chance to prepare and pass 117-301 exam at the first attempt.
killexams.com Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as below;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for complete exams on web site
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders additional than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders over $99
SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for complete Orders
Quality and Value for the 117-301 Exam: killexams.com practice Exams for LPI 117-301 are composed to the most astounding benchmarks of specialized precision, utilizing just guaranteed topic specialists and distributed creators for improvement.
100% Guarantee to Pass Your 117-301 Exam: If you don't pass the LPI 117-301 exam utilizing their killexams.com testing engine, they will give you a replete REFUND of your acquiring expense.
Downloadable, Interactive 117-301 Testing engines: Their LPI 117-301 Preparation Material gives you complete that you should occupy LPI 117-301 exam. Subtle elements are inquired about and created by LPI Certification Experts continually utilizing industry suffer to deliver actual, and intelligent.
- Comprehensive questions and answers about 117-301 exam
- 117-301 exam questions joined by displays
- Verified Answers by Experts and very nearly 100% right
- 117-301 exam questions updated on common premise
- 117-301 exam planning is in various decision questions (MCQs).
- Tested by different circumstances previously distributing
- Try free 117-301 exam demo before you choose to Get it in killexams.com
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for complete exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for complete Orders
No result found, try novel keyword!These names contain outperformed the southern operators dote Approach (NASDAQ:AREX) and Laredo (NYSE:LPI). Well results in the northern partake ... It currently has five horizontal and one plumb rig runn...
First Republic Bank (FRC) reported first-quarter 2014 adjusted earnings of 67 cents per share, beating the Zacks Consensus assay of 64 cents. However, the reported design compared unfavorably with 72 cents per partake earned in the year-ago quarter.
Better-than-expected results were mainly driven by revenue growth, partially offset by a tower in expenses. Capital energy and solid franchise progress were the other tailwinds.
Including inevitable one-time items, the company reported net income of $114.7 million, down 6.4% from the prior-year quarter. Net income available to the common shareholders was $100.8 million, down 12.2% from the prior-year quarter.
Performance in Detail
Total revenue was $362.2 million, up 7.8% year over year. Excluding the repercussion of purchase accounting, First Republic’s core revenue came in at $381.7 million, up 3.1% year over year but below the Zacks Consensus assay of $382.0 million.
First Republic’s net interest income increased 7.6% year over year to $320.7 million. Excluding the repercussion of purchase accounting, net interest income was $301.2 million, up 14.2% from the year-ago quarter.
However, core net interest margin fell 25 basis points (bps) year over year to 3.17%. Excluding the repercussion of purchase accounting, margin was 3.37%, down 50 bps year over year.
The company’s non-interest income came in at $61.0 million, down 15.6% year over year. The decline was primarily owing to a significant Fall in proceeds from the sale of loans.
Non-interest expense was $213.4 million, up 17.4% year over year. An augment in salaries and employee benefits, expenses related to technology platform and professional fees primarily led to this rise.
Core efficiency ratio stood at 58.9% as compared with 54.1% in the prior-year quarter. Excluding the repercussion of purchase accounting, the ratio was 57.0% as against 50.4% in the prior-year quarter. An augment in efficiency ratio indicates decline in profitability.
First Republic’s credit property was mixed in the quarter under review. On a year-over-year basis, the provision for credit losses increased 9.5% to $7.1 million and total nonperforming assets rose 10.9 % to $55.3 million.Further, nonperforming assets to total assets ratio was 0.12%, down from 0.14% in the year-ago quarter. As of Dec 31, 2013, the ratio of net loan charge-offs to average total loans was 0.01%, up from 0.00% the prior-year period.
Asset and Capital Position
During the reported quarter, First Republic’s capital ratios were a mixed bag. As of Mar 31, 2014, the company’s Tier 1 leverage ratio was 9.85% versus 9.36% as of Mar 31, 2013.
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 14.07% compared with 13.53% as of Mar 31, 2013. Further, engage value per partake came in at $26.21, up from $22.97 at the finish of the prior-year quarter.
Net loans increased 22.9% year over year to $34.4 billion as of Mar 31, 2014, while total deposits rose 25.0 % to $33.6 billion.
First Republic announced an augment in its quarterly cash dividend for the first quarter to 14 cents per share, which is payable on May 15, 2014 to shareholders of record as of May 1, 2014.
We anticipate First Republic’s growth gaining momentum owing to its balance sheet strength. Moreover, tower in loans and deposits attest the company’s helpful organic growth prospects.
However, higher interest expenses and non-interest expenses are causes of concern. An unsettled economic environment and stringent regulations are the other challenges.
First Republic currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
Among other Western banks, BBCN Bancorp, Inc. (BBCN) is scheduled to report first-quarter results on Apr 21, while SVB fiscal Group (SIVB) and City National Corporation (CYN) are expected to report on Apr 24.
Read the replete Research Report on CYNRead the replete Research Report on SIVBRead the replete Research Report on BBCNRead the replete Research Report on FRC
CHICAGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--GATX Corporation (NYSE:GMT) today reported 2015 third quarter net income of $39.5 million or $0.91 per diluted share, compared to net income of $51.3 million or $1.14 per diluted partake in the third quarter of 2014. Net income through September 2015 was $147.1 million or $3.33 per diluted share, compared to $146.5 million or $3.18 per diluted partake in the prior year period. The 2015 third quarter and year-to-date results comprise a net after-tax loss of $26.6 million, or $0.61 per diluted partake related to the company’s decision to exit the majority of its marine investments within the Portfolio Management segment.
“The North American railcar leasing environment in 2015 has been consistent with their initial outlook,” said Brian A. Kenney, president and chief executive officer of GATX. “Certain North American car types, especially coal cars, are experiencing decreasing demand. However, GATX’s Lease charge Index, renewal metrics, and remarketing income complete remain strong. Rail North America’s utilization remains extremely lofty at 99.2%, reflecting the composition and term structure of GATX’s diverse fleet.”
“Rail International, particularly their European fleet, continues to achieve solid operating results. At American Steamship Company, benign weather conditions, higher water levels, and spot cargoes helped to partially offset softening exact for iron ore on the majestic Lakes.”
“During the third-quarter of 2015 they made a strategic decision to exit the majority of their marine investments within their Portfolio Management segment. Although their investments in inland marine assets historically performed very well for GATX, their investments in ocean-going vessels contain experienced significant earnings volatility. Given that inland marine and ocean-going investments are no longer core to GATX, they are opting to monetize these investments. The investments in Rolls-Royce and Partners Finance are unaffected by this decision and these joint ventures continue to fulfill very well.”
Mr. Kenney concluded, “We anticipate their 2015 full-year earnings to be at the upper ambit of their previously stated assay of $5.15 to $5.35 per diluted share, excluding any repercussion of the exit from Portfolio Management’s marine investments.”
“Looking longer-term, the growing over-supply of tank cars is decreasing tank car renewal rates and making it more difficult to station novel tank cars delivering in 2016. Their early recognition of the impending changes in the tank car market was the backdrop for their strategy to lock in attractive lease rates for longer terms and maintain a disciplined investment strategy. As a result of this strategy, their committed lease revenues are at record levels, and this groundwork of stable cash current will serve us well when the environment for more attractive investment opportunities develops.”
RAIL NORTH AMERICA
Rail North America reported segment profit of $90.0 million in the third quarter of 2015, compared to $70.6 million in the third quarter of 2014. The augment in quarterly segment profit was primarily attributable to improved utilization and higher lease rates across the fleet.
Year to date, Rail North America reported segment profit of $280.7 million, compared to $237.3 million in the very age of 2014. The augment in year-to-date segment profit was driven by increased lease revenue from higher lease rates as well as a nine-month contribution and higher utilization from the acquired boxcar fleet compared to six months at a lower utilization rate in the prior year.
At September 30, 2015, Rail North America’s wholly owned fleet was approximately 125,000 cars, including more than 18,500 boxcars. The following fleet statistics exclude the boxcar fleet.
Fleet utilization was 99.2% at the finish of the third quarter, compared to 99.3% at the finish of the prior quarter and 98.8% at the finish of the third quarter of 2014. During the third quarter, the GATX Lease charge Index (“LPI”), a weighted average lease renewal rate for a group of railcars representative of Rail North America's fleet, increased 25.6% over the weighted average expiring lease rate. This compares to a 36.3% augment in the prior quarter and a 46.9% augment in the third quarter of 2014. A lackluster coal market continues to negatively repercussion GATX’s LPI. The average lease renewal term for complete cars included in the LPI during the third quarter was 60 months, compared to 54 months in the prior quarter and 68 months in the third quarter of 2014. Asset remarketing income was approximately $10.5 million during the quarter, and total investment volume was nearly $98 million.
Additional fleet statistics, including information on the boxcar fleet, and macroeconomic data related to Rail North America’s business are provided on the ultimate page of this press release.
Rail International's segment profit was $15.5 million in the third quarter of 2015, compared to $19.7 million in the third quarter of 2014. Rail International reported segment profit of $56.4 million year-to-date 2015, compared to $59.8 million for the very age in 2014. The lessen in the segment profit was driven primarily by the effects of a weaker Euro. These exotic exchange rate impacts contain been partially offset by higher lease revenue and lower maintenance costs at GATX Rail Europe (“GRE”).
At September 30, 2015, GRE's fleet consisted of approximately 22,800 cars and utilization was 95.7%, compared to 95.5% at the finish of the second quarter and 95.1% at the finish of the third quarter of 2014.
Additional fleet statistics for GATX Rail Europe are provided on the ultimate page of this press release.
AMERICAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY
American Steamship Company (“ASC”) reported a segment profit of $10.9 million in the third quarter of 2015 compared to segment profit of $15.2 million in the third quarter of 2014. Segment profit year-to-date 2015 was $13.4 million, compared to $17.1 million year-to-date 2014. ASC carried 19.5 million net tons of cargo through the third quarter of 2015, compared to 19.6 million net tons in the prior year period. The lessen in segment profit was driven by commodity and trade coalesce variances.
In the third quarter of 2015, Portfolio Management recorded a segment loss of $17.3 million, including a net pre-tax loss of approximately $42.5 million ($26.6 million after-tax) associated with the planned exit of the majority of Portfolio Management’s marine investments. The loss associated with this exit taken in the third quarter is expected to be partially offset by inland marine-related temperament gains that they anticipate to achieve in the fourth quarter.
Segment profit year-to-date 2015 was $8.9 million, compared to $40.1 million year-to-date 2014. The lessen in year-to-date segment profit was due to a net loss associated with the planned exit from Portfolio Management’s marine investments.
GATX Corporation (NYSE:GMT) strives to be recognized as the finest railcar leasing company in the world by its customers, its shareholders, its employees and the communities where it operates. As the largest global railcar lessor, GATX has been providing property railcars and services to its customers for more than 116 years. GATX has been headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, since its founding in 1898. For more information, please visit the Company's website at www.gatx.com.
GATX Corporation will host a teleconference to dispute 2015 third-quarter results. convoke details are as follows:
Thursday, October 22nd11:00 A.M. Eastern TimeDomestic Dial-In: 1-877-675-4753International Dial-In: 1-719-325-4810Replay: 1-888-203-1112 or 1-719-457-0820/Access Code: 216717
Call-in details, a copy of this press release and real-time audio access are available at www.gatx.com. please access the convoke 15 minutes prior to the start time. Following the call, a replay will be available on the very site.
Forward-looking statements in this press release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” within the acceptation of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These comprise statements that reflect their current views with respect to, among other things, future events, fiscal performance and market conditions. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the exhaust of words such as “may,” “could,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “likely,” “will,” “would,” and variations of these terms and similar expressions, or the negative of these terms or similar expressions. Specific risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, (1) changes in regulatory requirements for tank cars carrying crude, ethanol, and other flammable liquids, (2) competitive factors in their primary markets, (3) inability to maintain their assets on lease at satisfactory rates, (4) fragile economic conditions, fiscal market volatility, and other factors that may lessen exact for their assets and services, (5) changes to, or failure to comply with, laws, rules, and regulations applicable to their assets and operations, (6) operational disruption and increased costs associated with compliance maintenance programs and other maintenance initiatives, (7) fiscal and operational risks associated with long-term railcar purchase commitments, (8) deterioration of conditions in the capital markets, reductions in their credit ratings, or increases in their financing costs, (9) events having an adverse repercussion on assets, customers, or regions where they contain a large investment, (10) decreased exact for inevitable railcars used in the petroleum industry due to sustained low crude-oil prices, (11) risks related to international operations and expansion into novel geographic markets, (12) inadequate allowances to cover credit losses in their portfolio, (13) asset impairment charges they may be required to recognize, (14) environmental remediation costs or a negative outcome in their pending or threatened litigation, (15) inability to obtain cost-effective insurance, (16) fluctuations in exotic exchange rates, (17) operational and fiscal risks related to their affiliate investments, (18) reduced opportunities to generate asset remarketing income, (19) failure to successfully negotiate collective bargaining agreements with the unions representing a substantial portion of their employees, and (20) other risks discussed in their filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including their shape 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, and their subsequently filed shape 10-Q reports, complete of which are available on the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov).
Investors should not station undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made, and are not guarantees of future performance. The Company undertakes no duty to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements.
Investor, corporate, financial, historical financial, photographic and news release information may be found at www.gatx.com.
GATX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(In millions, except per partake data)
Three Months EndedSeptember 30
Nine Months EndedSeptember 30
Marine operating revenue
Marine operating expense
Operating lease expense
Other operating expense
Selling, common and administrative expense
Other Income (Expense)
Net (loss) gain on asset dispositions
Interest expense, net
Income before Income Taxes and partake of Affiliates’ Earnings
Share of Affiliates’ Earnings (net of tax)
Basic earnings per share
Average number of common shares
Diluted earnings per share
Average number of common shares and common partake equivalents
Dividends declared per common share
GATX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED balance SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Rent and other receivables
Less: allowance for losses
Operating Assets and Facilities
Less: allowance for depreciation
Investments in Affiliated Companies
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Commercial paper and borrowings under bank credit facilities
Capital lease obligations
Deferred Income Taxes
Total Shareholders’ Equity
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
GATX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SEGMENT DATA (UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
Marine operating revenue
Marine operating expense
Operating lease expense
Other operating expense
Other Income (Expense)
Net gain (loss) on asset dispositions
Interest expense, net
Share of affiliates’ earnings (pretax) (1)
Segment Profit (Loss)
Selling, common and administrative expense
Income taxes (includes $2.8 tax benefit related to affiliates’ earnings)
Net Gain on Asset Dispositions
(1) Includes on- and off-balance-sheet recourse debt; capital lease obligations; commercial paper and bank credit facilities, net of unrestricted cash.
(2) Calculated as total recourse debt / shareholder's equity.
Reconciliation of Total Assets to Total Assets (Including Off-Balance-Sheet Assets), Excluding Cash:
Manufacturing Capacity Utilization Index (3)
Year-over-year Change in U.S. Carloadings (excl. intermodal) (4)
Year-over-year Change in U.S. Carloadings (chemical) (4)
Year-over-year Change in U.S. Carloadings (petroleum) (4)
Production Backlog at Railcar Manufacturers (5)
American Steamship Company Statistics
Total Net Tons Carried (millions)
GATX's Lease charge Index ("LPI") is an internally-generated business indicator that measures lease rate pricing on renewals within their North American railcar fleet, excluding the boxcar fleet. The index is calculated using the weighted average lease rate for a group of railcar types that GATX believes best represents its overall North American fleet, excluding boxcars. The average renewal lease rate change is reported as the percentage change between the average renewal lease rate and the average expiring lease rate, weighted by fleet composition. The average renewal lease term is reported in months and reflects the average renewal lease term of railcar types in the LPI, weighted by fleet composition.
Excludes boxcar fleet.
As reported and revised by the Federal Reserve.
As reported by the Association of American Railroads (AAR).
As reported by the Railway Supply Institute (RSI).
Save huge amounts of cash when you buy international edition textbooks from TEXTBOOKw.com. An international edition is a textbook that has been published outside of the US and can be drastically cheaper than the US edition.
** International edition textbooks save students an average of 50% over the prices offered at their college bookstores.
Computer Security: Principles and Practice By William Stallings, Lawrie Brown Publisher : Pearson (Aug 2017) ISBN10 : 0134794109 ISBN13 : 9780134794105 Our ISBN10 : 1292220619 Our ISBN13 : 9781292220611 Subject : Computer Science & Technology
Urban Economics By Arthur O’Sullivan Publisher : McGraw-Hill (Jan 2018) ISBN10 : 126046542X ISBN13 : 9781260465426 Our ISBN10 : 1260084493 Our ISBN13 : 9781260084498 Subject : Business & Economics
Urban Economics By Arthur O’Sullivan Publisher : McGraw-Hill (Jan 2018) ISBN10 : 0078021782 ISBN13 : 9780078021787 Our ISBN10 : 1260084493 Our ISBN13 : 9781260084498 Subject : Business & Economics
Understanding Business By William G Nickels, James McHugh, Susan McHugh Publisher : McGraw-Hill (Feb 2018) ISBN10 : 126021110X ISBN13 : 9781260211108 Our ISBN10 : 126009233X Our ISBN13 : 9781260092332 Subject : Business & Economics
Understanding Business By William Nickels, James McHugh, Susan McHugh Publisher : McGraw-Hill (May 2018) ISBN10 : 1260682137 ISBN13 : 9781260682137 Our ISBN10 : 126009233X Our ISBN13 : 9781260092332 Subject : Business & Economics
Understanding Business By William Nickels, James McHugh, Susan McHugh Publisher : McGraw-Hill (Jan 2018) ISBN10 : 1260277143 ISBN13 : 9781260277142 Our ISBN10 : 126009233X Our ISBN13 : 9781260092332 Subject : Business & Economics
Understanding Business By William Nickels, James McHugh, Susan McHugh Publisher : McGraw-Hill (Jan 2018) ISBN10 : 1259929434 ISBN13 : 9781259929434 Our ISBN10 : 126009233X Our ISBN13 : 9781260092332 Subject : Business & Economics
117-301 By Peter W. Cardon Publisher : McGraw-Hill (Jan 2017) ISBN10 : 1260128474 ISBN13 : 9781260128475 Our ISBN10 : 1259921883 Our ISBN13 : 9781259921889 Subject : Business & Economics, Communication & Media
117-301 By Peter Cardon Publisher : McGraw-Hill (Feb 2017) ISBN10 : 1260147150 ISBN13 : 9781260147155 Our ISBN10 : 1259921883 Our ISBN13 : 9781259921889 Subject : Business & Economics, Communication & Media